The role of scientific knowledge in the public's perceptions of energy technology risks

被引:48
作者
Stoutenborough, James W. [1 ]
Vedlitz, Arnold [2 ]
机构
[1] Idaho State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 302 Gravely Hall, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Sci Technol & Publ Policy, Bush Sch Govt & Publ Serv, 4350 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Public's scientific knowledge; Risk assessments; Energy technologies; Knowledge deficit model; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; POLICY SUPPORT; ATTITUDES; STAKEHOLDERS; WILLINGNESS; IMPACTS; SCIENCE; TRUST; LAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is important for policy makers to have an accurate understanding of public attitudes toward pressing issues to help inform their decision making. Researchers consistently find that the public's receipt of and correct processing of scientific information and knowledge are essential for its problem solving. Different levels of understanding of specific energy technologies may produce different risk assessments across technologies within this issue domain. How this differential risk assessment occurs and the role that scientific information may play in it is not yet well known. This project seeks to determine the role that perceived and objective scientific knowledge may play in the public's risk assessments of different energy technologies. Our findings suggest that scientific knowledge does temper public risk evaluations of different energy technologies, therefore linking more clearly the connection between science knowledge, scientific trust, and issue problem identification. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 216
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Alerstam T, 1990, BIRD MIGRATION
[2]   New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies [J].
Amara, N ;
Ouimet, M ;
Landry, R .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 26 (01) :75-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], CARBON DIOXIDE BECAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], W13004850000 ETSU UK
[5]  
[Anonymous], CAPITALISM REVISITED
[6]  
[Anonymous], NUCL IS SAFEST FORM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, RISK COMMUNICATION M
[8]  
[Anonymous], I RATIONAL CHOICE AS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1965, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
[10]  
[Anonymous], CLIM CHANG 2001 MIT