Bare-earth extraction from airborne LiDAR data based on segmentation modeling and iterative surface corrections

被引:8
作者
Chang, Li-Der [1 ]
Slatton, K. Clint [1 ,2 ]
Krekelera, Carolyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Civil & Coastal Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
filtering; segmentation; iterative surface correction; LiDAR; detection; DTM; DEM GENERATION; ALGORITHM; ALTIMETRY;
D O I
10.1117/1.3491194
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last decade, various algorithms have been developed for extracting the digital terrain model from LiDAR point clouds. Although most filters perform well in flat and uncomplicated landscapes, landscapes containing steep slopes and discontinuities are still problematic. In this research, we develop a novel bare-earth extraction algorithm consisting of segmentation modeling and surface modeling based on our previous work, forest canopy removal. The proposed segmentation modeling is built on a triangulated irregular network and composed of triangle assimilation, edge clustering, and point classification to achieve better discrimination of objects and preserve terrain discontinuities. The surface modeling is proposed to iteratively correct both Type I and Type II errors through estimating roughness of digital surface/terrain models, detecting bridges and sharp ridges, etc. Finally, we have compared our obtained filtering results with twelve other filters working on the same fifteen study sites provided by the ISPRS. Our average error and kappa index of agreement in the automated process are 4.6% and 84.5%, respectively, which outperform all other twelve proposed filters. Our kappa index, 84.5%, can be interpreted as almost perfect agreement. In addition, applying this work with optimized parameters further improves performance.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Digital Image Processing
[2]  
Axelsson P., 2000, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, VXXXIII, P110, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ISPRSJPRS.2005.10.005
[3]  
BALLIGH A, 2008, P COMM 3 ISPRS C BEI, V6
[4]  
Brovelli M. A., 2002, GRASS US C TRENT IT
[5]   Automatic Forest Canopy Removal Algorithm for Underneath Obscure Target Detection by Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Data [J].
Chang, Li-Der ;
Slatton, K. Clint ;
Anand, Vivek ;
Liu, Pang-Wei ;
Lee, Heezin ;
Campbell, Michael V. .
DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XV, 2010, 7664
[6]   Filtering airborne laser scanning data with morphological methods [J].
Chen, Qi ;
Gong, Peng ;
Baldocchi, Dennis ;
Xie, Gengxin .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 73 (02) :175-185
[7]   A REVIEW OF ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA [J].
CONGALTON, RG .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 37 (01) :35-46
[8]  
Congalton RG, 2019, Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices, V3
[9]  
Elmqvist M., 2001, International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, V34, P211
[10]  
FILIN S, 2002, REMOTE SENS, V34, pA3