Characterizing a proton beam scanning system for Monte Carlo dose calculation in patients

被引:50
|
作者
Grassberger, C. [1 ,2 ]
Lomax, Anthony [2 ]
Paganetti, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
active scanning proton therapy; Monte Carlo simulation; patient dose calculation; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; THERAPY; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/633
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The presented work has two goals. First, to demonstrate the feasibility of accurately characterizing a proton radiation field at treatment head exit for Monte Carlo dose calculation of active scanning patient treatments. Second, to show that this characterization can be done based on measured depth dose curves and spot size alone, without consideration of the exact treatment head delivery system. This is demonstrated through calibration of a Monte Carlo code to the specific beam lines of two institutions, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Comparison of simulations modeling the full treatment head at MGH to ones employing a parameterized phase space of protons at treatment head exit reveals the adequacy of the method for patient simulations. The secondary particle production in the treatment head is typically below 0.2% of primary fluence, except for low-energy electrons (<0.6 MeV for 230 MeV protons), whose contribution to skin dose is negligible. However, there is significant difference between the two methods in the low-dose penumbra, making full treatment head simulations necessary to study out-of-field effects such as secondary cancer induction. To calibrate the Monte Carlo code to measurements in a water phantom, we use an analytical Bragg peak model to extract the range-dependent energy spread at the two institutions, as this quantity is usually not available through measurements. Comparison of the measured with the simulated depth dose curves demonstrates agreement within 0.5 mm over the entire energy range. Subsequently, we simulate three patient treatments with varying anatomical complexity (liver, head and neck and lung) to give an example how this approach can be employed to investigate site-specific discrepancies between treatment planning system and Monte Carlo simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 645
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning
    Fracchiolla, F.
    Lorentini, S.
    Widesott, L.
    Schwarz, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (21) : 8601 - 8619
  • [2] A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Huang, Sheng
    Harms, Joseph
    Zhou, Jun
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Dhabaan, Anees
    Slopsema, Roelf
    Kang, Minglei
    Liu, Tian
    McDonald, Mark
    Langen, Katja
    Lin, Liyong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1545 - 1557
  • [3] Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton therapy
    Holmes, Jason
    Feng, Hongying
    Zhang, Lian
    Fix, Michael K.
    Jiang, Steve B.
    Liu, Wei
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (17)
  • [4] Macro Monte Carlo for dose calculation of proton beams
    Fix, Michael K.
    Frei, Daniel
    Volken, Werner
    Born, Ernst J.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Manser, Peter
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (07) : 2027 - 2044
  • [5] Pitfalls in the beam modelling process of Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Aitkenhead, Adam
    Oxley, David
    Richardson, Jenny
    Weber, Damien C.
    MacKay, Ranald, I
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Safai, Sairos
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107)
  • [6] Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning
    Winterhalter, C.
    Fura, E.
    Tian, Y.
    Aitkenhead, A.
    Bolsi, A.
    Dieterle, M.
    Fredh, A.
    Meier, G.
    Oxley, D.
    Siewert, D.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A.
    Safai, S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (17)
  • [7] Adaptive step size algorithm to increase efficiency of proton macro Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Kueng, Reto
    Frei, Daniel
    Volken, Werner
    Stuermlin, Fabian
    Stampanoni, Marco F. M.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Manser, Peter
    Fix, Michael K.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [8] Monte Carlo framework for commissioning a synchrotron-based discrete spot scanning proton beam system and treatment plan verification
    Moskvin, Vadim P.
    Faught, Austin
    Pirlepesov, Fakhriddin
    Zhao, Li
    Hua, Chia-Ho
    Merchant, Thomas E.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [9] A Monte Carlo Determination of Dose and Range Uncertainties for Preclinical Studies with a Proton Beam
    Bongrand, Arthur
    Koumeir, Charbel
    Villoing, Daphnee
    Guertin, Arnaud
    Haddad, Ferid
    Metivier, Vincent
    Poirier, Freddy
    Potiron, Vincent
    Servagent, Noel
    Supiot, Stephane
    Delpon, Gregory
    Chiavassa, Sophie
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [10] A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system
    Lin, Liyong
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Hiltunen, Petri
    Vanderstraeten, Reynald
    Lindberg, Jari
    Siljamaki, Sami
    Wareing, Todd
    Davis, Ian
    Barnett, Allen
    McGhee, John
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Ainsley, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (02): : 44 - 49