Safe link mechanism based on nonlinear stiffness for collision safety

被引:49
作者
Park, Jung-Jun [1 ]
Kim, Byeong-Sang [1 ]
Song, Jae-Bok [1 ]
Kim, Hong-Seok [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul 136713, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Ind Technol, Dept Robot Technol Dev, Ansan 425791, Kyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
safety mechanism; nonlinear stiffness; passive compliance; safe robot arm;
D O I
10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.10.004
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A safe robot arm can be achieved by either a passive or active compliance system. A passive compliance system composed of purely mechanical elements often provide faster and more reliable responses for dynamic collision than an active one involving sensors and actuators. Since both positioning accuracy and collision safety are important, a robot arm should exhibit very low stiffness when subjected to a collision force greater than the one causing human injury, but maintain very high stiffness otherwise. To implement these requirements, a novel safe link mechanism ( SLM), which consists of linear springs, a double- slider mechanism and shock- absorbing modules, is proposed in this research. The SLM has the advantages of variable stiffness which can be achieved only by passive mechanical elements. Various experiments of static and dynamic collisions showed the high stiffness of the SLM against an external force of less than the critical impact force, but an abrupt drop in the stiffness when the external force exceeds the critical force, thus guaranteeing collision safety. Furthermore, the critical impact force can be set to any value depending on the application. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1348
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [J].
Bicchi, A ;
Tonietti, G .
IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2004, 11 (02) :22-33
[2]  
Crandall SH, 1978, INTRO MECH SOLIDS
[3]  
De Luca A, 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-12, P1623
[4]  
KANG S, 2002, P INT C CONTR AUT SY, P88
[5]  
LAURINKOVITZ KF, 1991, 1991 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-3, P1476, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1991.131824
[6]  
Morita T., 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), P2229, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.846359
[7]  
MORITA T, 1995, IROS '95 - 1995 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS: HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION AND COOPERATIVE ROBOTS, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, P407, DOI 10.1109/IROS.1995.525828
[8]  
Okada M, 2001, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P348, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932576
[9]  
SHIMAMOTO N, 1998, P 16 INT TECHN C ENH, P1954
[10]  
Tonietti G, 2005, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P526