Systematic review of efficacy of dose-dense versus non-dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung cancer

被引:19
作者
Lyman, Gary H. [1 ,2 ]
Barron, Richard L. [3 ]
Natoli, Jaime L. [4 ]
Miller, Ross M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duke Ctr Clin Hlth Policy Research, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Amgen Inc, Global Hlth Econ, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[4] Cerner LifeSci, Beverly Hills, CA USA
关键词
Dose-dense chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Non-small-cell lung cancer; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; 3-WEEKLY CHOP CHEMOTHERAPY; COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUP; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; AGGRESSIVE LYMPHOMAS; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; EPIRUBICIN; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; ETOPOSIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.04.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a potential advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy in improving disease-free and overall survival in patients with certain malignancies. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy across various cancers (breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], and non-small cell lung cancer) and chemotherapy regimens. Among the 17 trials identified, few reported statistically significant differences between dose-dense and standard chemotherapy, and most were small with limited statistical power. Statistically significant differences in overall survival favoring dose-dense schedules were apparent among large RCTs in potentially curative settings such as early-stage breast cancer and NHL. Clinical and treatment heterogeneity demonstrated the flexibility of the dose-dense paradigm but also precluded quantitative meta-analysis of results. Further study of dose-dense schedules based on large RCTs is needed to demonstrate the consistency and generalizability of these findings. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 308
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer [J].
Baldini, E ;
Gardin, G ;
Giannessi, PG ;
Evangelista, G ;
Roncella, M ;
Prochilo, T ;
Collecchi, P ;
Rosso, R ;
Lionetto, R ;
Bruzzi, P ;
Mosca, F ;
Conte, PF .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) :227-232
[2]  
Baldini E, 2001, P AM SOC CLIN ONCO 1, V20, p37a
[3]  
Berry DA, 27 ANN SAN ANT BREAS
[4]  
Bonadonna G, 1997, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
[5]   Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Bonilla, Luisa ;
Ben-Aharon, Irit ;
Vidal, Liat ;
Gafter-Gvili, Anat ;
Leibovici, Leonard ;
Stemmer, Salomon M. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (24) :1845-1854
[6]   Randomized, controlled, multicenter phase III trial of standard-dose fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC), compared with time-intensive FEC (FEC-G) and mitoxantrone-methotrexate-mitomycin C (MMM-G) in metastatic breast carcinoma [J].
Capotorto, AM ;
Pavesi, L ;
Pedrazzoli, P ;
Da Prada, GA ;
Zamagni, C ;
Massidda, B ;
Farris, A ;
Martoni, A ;
Lelli, G ;
Della Cuna, GR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 15 (02) :184-191
[7]  
Chang J, 2000, EUR J CANCER, V36, pS11
[8]   Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of intergroup trial C9741/cancer and leukemia group B trial 9741 [J].
Citron, ML ;
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, C ;
Hudis, C ;
Winer, EP ;
Gradishar, WJ ;
Davidson, NE ;
Martino, S ;
Livingston, R ;
Ingle, JN ;
Perez, EA ;
Carpenter, J ;
Hurd, D ;
Holland, JF ;
Smith, BL ;
Sartor, CI ;
Leung, EH ;
Abrams, J ;
Schilsky, RL ;
Muss, HB ;
Norton, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) :1431-1439
[9]   A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer [J].
De Boer, RH ;
Eisen, TG ;
Ellis, PA ;
Johnston, SRD ;
Walsh, G ;
Ashley, S ;
Smith, IE .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (06) :889-894
[10]   CEOP-21 versus CEOP-14 chemotherapy with or without rituximab for the first-line treatment of patients with aggressive lymphomas: Results of the HE22A99 trial of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group [J].
Economopoulos, T. ;
Psyrri, A. ;
Dimopoulos, M. A. ;
Kalogera-Fountzila, A. ;
Pavlidis, N. ;
Tsatalas, C. ;
Nikolaides, C. ;
Mellou, S. ;
Xiros, N. ;
Fountzilas, G. .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (05) :327-334