Factors influencing Malaysian public attitudes to agro-biotechnology

被引:28
作者
Amin, Latifah [1 ]
Ahmad, Jamil [2 ]
Jahi, Jamaluddin Md. [3 ]
Nor, Abd Rahim Md. [4 ]
Osman, Mohamad [5 ]
Mahadi, Nor Muhammad [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Ctr Gen Studies, Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Educ, Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Inst Malay World & Civilizat, Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[4] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Environm Management Programme, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Bangi, Malaysia
[5] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Bangi, Malaysia
关键词
agro-biotechnology; factors influencing attitude; Malaysian; moral concerns; perceived benefit; structural equation modeling; RISK PERCEPTION; FOOD RISKS; DEFICIT;
D O I
10.1177/0963662510369622
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Despite considerable research in advanced countries on public perceptions of and attitudes to modern biotechnology, limited effort has been geared towards developing a structural model of public attitudes to modern biotechnology. The purpose of this paper is to identify the relevant factors influencing public attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) soybean, and to analyze the relationship between all the attitudinal factors. A survey was carried out on 1,017 respondents from various stakeholder groups in the Klang Valley region. Results of the survey have confirmed that attitudes towards complex issues such as biotechnology should be seen as a multifaceted process. The most important factors predicting support for GM soybean are the specific application-linked perceptions about the benefits, acceptance of risk and moral concern while risk and familiarity are significant predictors of benefit and risk acceptance. Attitudes towards GM soybean are also predicted by several general classes of attitude.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 689
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aiken L.R., 1994, PSYCHOL TESTING ASSE, V8th
[2]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT [J].
ALHAKAMI, AS ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1085-1096
[3]  
Amin L., 2004, P 2 BANG WORLD C ENV, P630
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS G
[6]  
[Anonymous], 7 ICABR INT CONS AGR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy
[8]  
[Anonymous], 17 U GUELPH DEP PLAN
[9]  
Ansari Z.A., 2003, WORLD ASS MUSL YOUTH
[10]   Religious values and environmental concern: Harmony and detachment [J].
Biel, A ;
Nilsson, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 86 (01) :178-191