A Multi-Laboratory Comparison of Methods for Detection and Quantification of African Swine Fever Virus

被引:4
|
作者
Olesen, Ann Sofie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen, Thomas Bruun [1 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose [4 ]
Belsham, Graham J. [1 ,2 ]
Boklund, Anette [4 ]
Ploegaert, Tosca [5 ]
Moonen-Leusen, Bernie [5 ]
Blome, Sandra [6 ]
Botner, Anette [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Natl Vet Inst, DK-4771 Lindholm, Kalvehave, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Vet Clin Microbiol, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Virus & Microbiol Special Diagnost, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Sect Anim Welf & Dis Control, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Virol Wageningen Biovet Res, NL-8221 RA Lelystad, Netherlands
[6] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Inst Diagnost Virol, D-17493 Greifswald, Germany
来源
PATHOGENS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
African swine fever; qPCR; quantification; ring trial; virus infectivity; virus titration; WILD BOAR; CELL-LINE; PCR ASSAY; INFECTION; EXPRESSION; GENERATION; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; ISOLATE; FIELD;
D O I
10.3390/pathogens11030325
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
African swine fever is a viral disease of the family Suidae. Methods to detect and quantify African swine fever virus (ASFV) include qPCR and virus infectivity assays. Individual laboratories often use in-house procedures for these assays, which can hamper the comparison of results. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of ASFV detection using these assays, and to determine the inter-test correlations between results. This was achieved by testing a panel of 80 samples at three reference laboratories. Samples were analysed using nucleic acid extraction and qPCR, as well as virus infectivity assays. For qPCR, a very high probability (ranging from 0.96 to 1.0) of detecting ASFV DNA was observed for all tested systems. For virus infectivity assays in cells, the probability of detecting infectious ASFV varied from 0.68 to 0.90 and was highest using pulmonary alveolar macrophages, followed by MARC145 cells, peripheral blood monocytes, and finally wild boar lung cells. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates of 0.97 (0.96-0.98) between qPCR methods, 0.80 (0.74-0.85) to 0.94 (0.92-0.96) between virus infectivity assays, and 0.77 (0.68-0.83) to 0.95 (0.93-0.96) between qPCR methods and virus infectivity assays were obtained. These findings show that qPCR gives the highest probability for the detection of ASFV.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pathogenicity and virulence of African swine fever virus
    Ruedas-Torres, Ines
    Nga, Bui Thi To
    Salguero, Francisco J.
    VIRULENCE, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [22] Development and clinical application of a novel CRISPR-Cas12a based assay for the detection of African swine fever virus
    Wang, Xiaoying
    He, Sheng
    Zhao, Na
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Cao, Yongchang
    Zhang, Guihong
    Wang, Gang
    Guo, Chunhe
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [23] Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods
    Stewart, Jill R.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    Dubinsky, Eric A.
    Fong, Theng-Theng
    Goodwin, Kelly D.
    Griffith, John F.
    Noble, Rachel T.
    Shanks, Orin C.
    Vijayavel, Kannappan
    Weisberg, Stephen B.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (18) : 6829 - 6838
  • [24] Detection of African swine fever virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification
    James, Heather E.
    Ebert, K.
    McGonigle, R.
    Reid, Scott M.
    Boonham, Neil
    Tomlinson, Jennifer A.
    Hutchings, Geoffrey H.
    Denyer, Mick
    Oura, Chris A. L.
    Dukes, Juliet P.
    King, Donald P.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 164 (1-2) : 68 - 74
  • [25] First Detection of Antibodies Against African Swine Fever Virus in Faeces Samples
    Nieto-Pelegrin, E.
    Rivera-Arroyo, B.
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2015, 62 (06) : 594 - 602
  • [26] Establishment of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for the detection of African swine fever virus antibodies
    Wang, Wan
    Zhang, Zhenjiang
    Tesfagaber, Weldu
    Zhang, Jiwen
    Li, Fang
    Sun, Encheng
    Tang, Lijie
    Bu, Zhigao
    Zhu, Yuanmao
    Zhao, Dongming
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2024, 23 (01) : 228 - 238
  • [27] Effect of husbandry methods on seropositivity to African swine fever virus in Sardinian swine herds
    Mannelli, A
    Sotgia, S
    Patta, C
    Sarria, A
    Madrau, P
    Sanna, L
    Firinu, A
    Laddomada, A
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1997, 32 (3-4) : 235 - 241
  • [28] Development and inter-laboratory validation study of an improved new real-time PCR assay with internal control for detection and laboratory diagnosis of African swine fever virus
    Tignon, Marylene
    Gallardo, Carmina
    Iscaro, Carmen
    Hutet, Evelyne
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Kolbasov, Denis
    De Mia, Gian Mario
    Le Potier, Marie-Frederique
    Bishop, Richard P.
    Arias, Marisa
    Koenen, Frank
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 178 (1-2) : 161 - 170
  • [29] On the situation of African swine fever and the biological characterization of recent virus isolates
    Tauscher, Kerstin
    Pietschmann, Jana
    Wernike, Kerstin
    Teifke, Jens P.
    Beer, Martin
    Blome, Sandra
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2015, 128 (5-6): : 169 - 176
  • [30] Transmission rate of African swine fever virus under experimental conditions
    Ferreira, H. C. de Carvalho
    Backer, J. A.
    Weesendorp, E.
    Klinkenberg, D.
    Stegeman, J. A.
    Loeffen, W. L. A.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 165 (3-4) : 296 - 304