The Relative Position Priming Effect Depends on Whether Letters Are Vowels or Consonants

被引:43
作者
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon [1 ]
Carreiras, Manuel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Basque Ctr Cognit Brain & Language BCBL, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[2] BCBL, Bilbao, Spain
[3] Basque Fdn Sci, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
lexical constraint hypothesis; consonants and vowels; relative position priming; visual word recognition; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; INTERACTIVE-ACTIVATION MODEL; SIMILARITY EFFECTS OCCUR; PHONOLOGICAL CODE ACTIVATION; ACQUIRED DYSGRAPHIA; PRINTED WORD; LETTER TRANSPOSITIONS; LEXICAL SELECTION; LETTER PERCEPTION; TIME-COURSE;
D O I
10.1037/a0023577
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relative position priming effect is a type of subset priming in which target word recognition is facilitated as a consequence of priming the word with some of its letters, maintaining their relative position (e.g., csn as a prime for casino). Five experiments were conducted to test whether vowel-only and consonant-only subset primes contribute equally to this effect. Experiment 1 revealed that this subset priming effect emerged when primes were composed exclusively of consonants, compared with vowel-only primes (csn-casino vs. aia-animal). Experiment 2 tested the impact of letter frequency in this asymmetry. Subset priming effects were obtained for both high- and low-frequency consonants but not for vowels, which rules out a letter frequency explanation. Experiment 3 tested the role of phonology and its contribution to the priming effects observed, by decreasing the prime duration. The results showed virtually the same effects as in the previous experiments. Finally, Experiments 4 and 5 explored the influence of repeated letters in the primes on the magnitude of the priming effects obtained for consonant and vowel subset primes (iuo-dibujo and aea-madera vs. mgn-imagen and rtr-frutero). Again, the results confirmed the priming asymmetry. We propose that a functional distinction between consonants and vowels, mainly based on the lexical constraints imposed by each of these types of letters, might provide an explanation for the whole set of results.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1163
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: 'casual' or 'causal'? [J].
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Molinaro, Nicola ;
Laka, Itziar ;
Estevez, Adelina ;
Carreiras, Manuel .
NEUROREPORT, 2009, 20 (04) :381-387
[2]   A ROSE IS A REEZ - THE 2-CYCLES MODEL OF PHONOLOGY ASSEMBLY IN READING ENGLISH [J].
BERENT, I ;
PERFETTI, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (01) :146-184
[3]   Linguistic constraints on statistical computations -: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing [J].
Bonatti, LL ;
Peña, M ;
Nespor, M ;
Mehler, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (06) :451-459
[4]   On consonants, vowels, chickens, and eggs [J].
Bonatti, Luca L. ;
Pena, Marcela ;
Nespor, Marina ;
Mehler, Jacques .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (10) :924-925
[5]   Separable processing of consonants and vowels [J].
Caramazza, A ;
Chialant, D ;
Capasso, R ;
Miceli, G .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6768) :428-430
[6]   Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition [J].
Carreiras, M ;
Ferrand, L ;
Grainger, J ;
Perea, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (08) :585-589
[7]   Brain activation for consonants and vowels [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Price, Cathy J. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (07) :1727-1735
[8]   ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: Are consonants processed differently from vowels? [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Vergara, Marta ;
Perea, Manuel .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2007, 419 (03) :219-224
[9]   Consonants and Vowels Contribute Differently to Visual Word Recognition: ERPs of Relative Position Priming [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Molinaro, Nicola .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (11) :2659-2670
[10]   Are Vowels and Consonants Processed Differently? Event-related Potential Evidence with a Delayed Letter Paradigm [J].
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Gillon-Dowens, Margaret ;
Vergara, Marta ;
Perea, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (02) :275-288