The influence of the 'organizational factor' on compound quality in drug discovery

被引:123
作者
Leeson, Paul D. [1 ]
St-Gallay, Stephen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood, Loughborough LE11 5RH, Leics, England
关键词
MARKETED ORAL-DRUGS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; VIVO TOXICOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; MEDICINAL CHEMISTS; PROPERTY PROFILES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; MOLECULAR-PROPERTIES; KINASE INHIBITOR; LEAD GENERATION; LIGAND-BINDING;
D O I
10.1038/nrd3552
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Physicochemical properties such as lipophilicity and molecular mass are known to have an important influence on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) profile of small-molecule drug candidates. To assess the use of this knowledge in reducing the likelihood of compound-related attrition, the molecular properties of compounds acting at specific drug targets described in patents from leading pharmaceutical companies during the 2000-2010 period were analysed. Over the past decade, there has been little overall change in properties that influence ADMET outcomes, but there are marked differences in molecular properties between organizations, which are maintained when the targets pursued are taken into account. The target-unbiased molecular property differences, which are attributable to divergent corporate drug design strategies, are comparable to the differences between the major drug target classes. On the basis of our analysis, we conclude that a substantial sector of the pharmaceutical industry has not modified its drug design practices and is still producing compounds with suboptimal physicochemical profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 765
页数:17
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   An integrated approach to fragment-based lead generation: Philosophy, strategy and case studies from AstraZeneca's drug discovery programmes [J].
Albert, Jeffrey S. ;
Blomberg, Niklas ;
Breeze, Alexander L. ;
Brown, Alastair J. H. ;
Burrows, Jeremy N. ;
Edwards, Philip D. ;
Folmer, Rutger H. A. ;
Geschwindner, Stefan ;
Griffen, Ed J. ;
Kenny, Peter W. ;
Nowak, Thorsten ;
Olsson, Lise-Lotte ;
Sanganee, Hitesh ;
Shapiro, Adam B. .
CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 7 (16) :1600-1629
[2]   Fragment-based drug discovery: What has it achieved so fair? [J].
Alex, Alexander A. ;
Flocco, Maria M. .
CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 7 (16) :1544-1567
[3]   Phase II failures: 2008-2010 [J].
Arrowsmith, John .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2011, 10 (05) :1-1
[4]   TRIAL WATCH Phase III and submission failures: 2007-2010 [J].
Arrowsmith, John .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2011, 10 (02) :1-1
[5]  
Azzaoui K, 2007, CHEMMEDCHEM, V2, P874, DOI 10.1002/cmdc.200700036
[6]   Analysis of pharmacology data and the prediction of adverse drug reactions and off-target effects from chemical structure [J].
Bender, Andreas ;
Scheiber, Josef ;
Glick, Meir ;
Davies, John W. ;
Azzaoui, Kamal ;
Hamon, Jacques ;
Urban, Laszlo ;
Whitebread, Steven ;
Jenkins, Jeremy L. .
CHEMMEDCHEM, 2007, 2 (06) :861-873
[7]   Development of Specific "Drug-Like Property" Rules for Carboxylate-Containing Oral Drug Candidates [J].
Boecker, Alexander ;
Bonneau, Pierre R. ;
Hucke, Oliver ;
Jakalian, Araz ;
Edwards, Paul J. .
CHEMMEDCHEM, 2010, 5 (12) :2102-2113
[8]   DEAL WATCH Valuation benefits of structure-enabled drug discovery [J].
Borshell, Nigel ;
Papp, Tibor ;
Congreve, Miles .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2011, 10 (03) :166-166
[9]   Getting pharmaceutical R&D back on target [J].
Bunnage, Mark E. .
NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (06) :335-339
[10]   Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules [J].
Carey, John S. ;
Laffan, David ;
Thomson, Colin ;
Williams, Mike T. .
ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY, 2006, 4 (12) :2337-2347