Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion-a Review

被引:3
作者
Matias, Caio M. [1 ]
Velagapudi, Lohit [1 ]
Montenegro, Thiago S. [1 ]
Heller, Joshua E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurosurg, 909 Walnut St,3rd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Sacroiliac dysfunction; Sacroiliac fusion; SI fusion; Low back pain; PAIN PROVOCATION TESTS; JOINT FUSION; LUMBOSACRAL FUSION; OUTCOMES; ARTHRODESIS; LUMBAR;
D O I
10.1007/s11916-022-01016-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review Sacroiliac dysfunction is an important cause of low back pain with significant impact on quality of life and daily activities. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MIS SI fusion) is an effective treatment for patients who failed non-surgical strategies. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical outcomes and complications of this surgical technique. Recent Findings For patients with SI joint dysfunction, MIS SI fusion reduced pain and disability as measured by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Index and improved quality of life as measured by Short-Form 36 and EuroQol-5D questionnaires. Satisfaction rates were higher in the SI fusion group when compared to the conservative management. In recent clinical trials, adverse events occurred with a similar rate in the first 6 months for patients assigned in the conservative management versus patients assigned to MIS SI fusion. MIS SI fusion is an effective and safe procedure for patients with sacroiliac dysfunction who failed non-surgical strategies. This procedure provides rapid as well as sustained pain relief, improvement in back function, high patient satisfaction, with low rate of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Etiopathogenesis of sacroiliitis: implications for assessment and management [J].
Baronio, Manuela ;
Sadia, Hajra ;
Paolacci, Stefano ;
Prestamburgo, Domenico ;
Miotti, Danilo ;
Guardamagna, Vittorio A. ;
Natalini, Giuseppe ;
Bertelli, Matteo .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 33 (04) :294-304
[2]  
Barros Guilherme, 2019, Fed Pract, V36, P370
[3]   Computed tomography versus fluoroscopic guided-sacroiliac joint injection: a prospective comparative study [J].
Bessar, Ahmed A. A. ;
Arnaout, Mohamed M. ;
Basha, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik ;
Shaker, Shady E. ;
Elsayed, Ashraf E. ;
Bessar, Manar Awad .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2021, 12 (01)
[4]  
Buchowski JM, 2005, SPINE J
[5]   Inciting events initiating injection-proven sacroiliac joint syndrome [J].
Chou, LH ;
Slipman, CW ;
Bhagia, SM ;
Tsaur, L ;
Bhat, AL ;
Isaac, Z ;
Gilchrist, R ;
El Abd, OH ;
Lenrow, DA .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 5 (01) :26-32
[6]   Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain [J].
Cohen, Steven P. ;
Hurley, Robert W. ;
Buckenmaier, Chester C., III ;
Kurihara, Connie ;
Morlando, Benny ;
Dragovich, Anthony .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 109 (02) :279-288
[7]   Four-year outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants [J].
Darr, Emily ;
Cher, Daniel .
MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 11 :287-289
[8]  
Dengler J, J BONE JT SURG AM, V2019
[9]  
Dengler J, 2017, SPINE PHILA PA 1976
[10]   Back pain prevalence and visit rates - Estimates from US national surveys, 2002 [J].
Deyo, Richard A. ;
Mirza, Sohail K. ;
Martin, Brook I. .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (23) :2724-2727