Fertility treatment for the transgender community: a public opinion study

被引:30
作者
Goldman, Randi H. [1 ]
Kaser, Daniel J. [2 ]
Missmer, Stacey A. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Farland, Leslie V. [1 ]
Scout [7 ]
Ashby, Rachel K. [1 ]
Ginsburg, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Infertil & Reprod Surg, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Reprod Med Associates New Jersey, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Adolescent & Young Adult Med, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Torvus Grp, Beverly Hills, CA 09212 USA
关键词
Transgender; Fertility preservation; Assisted reproduction; Trans health; Transitioning; HEALTH-CARE; ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; MEN; POLICY; DISCRIMINATION; PRESERVATION; REASSIGNMENT; INDIVIDUALS; EXPERIENCES; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose The purposes of this study were to evaluate public opinion regarding fertility treatment and gamete cryopreservation for transgender individuals and identify how support varies by demographic characteristics. Methods This is a cross-sectional web-based survey study completed by a representative sample of 1111 US residents aged 18-75 years. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of support for/opposition to fertility treatments for transgender people by demographic characteristics, adjusting a priori for age, gender, race, and having a biological child. Results Of 1336 people recruited, 1111 (83.2%) agreed to participate, and 986 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most respondents (76.2%) agreed that "Doctors should be able to help transgender people have biological children." Atheists/agnostics were more likely to be in support (88.5%) than Christian-Protestants (72.4%; OR = 3.10, CI = 1.37-7.02), as were younger respondents, sexual minorities, those divorced/widowed, Democrats, and non-parents. Respondents who did not know a gay person (10.0%; OR = 0.20, CI = 0.09-0.42) or only knew a gay person without children (41.4%; OR = 0.29, CI = 0.17-0.50) were more often opposed than those who knew a gay parent (48.7%). No differences in gender, geography, education, or income were observed. A smaller majority of respondents supported doctors helping transgender minors preserve gametes before transitioning (60.6%) or helping transgender men carry pregnancies (60.1%). Conclusions Most respondents who support assisted and third-party reproduction also support such interventions to help transgender people have children.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1467
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adashi EY, 2000, HUM REPROD, V15, P330
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INT J TRANSGEND
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NATL CTR TRANSGENDER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Statistical abstract of the United States
[5]   Americans' views on health policy: A fifty-year historical perspective [J].
Blendon, RJ ;
Benson, JM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (02) :33-46
[6]   The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda [J].
Burstein, P .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2003, 56 (01) :29-40
[7]   Prevalence of Transgender Depends on the "Case" Definition: A Systematic Review [J].
Collin, Lindsay ;
Reisner, Sari L. ;
Tangpricha, Vin ;
Goodman, Michael .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (04) :613-626
[8]   Transgender Health in Massachusetts: Results From a Household Probability Sample of Adults [J].
Conron, Kerith J. ;
Scott, Gunner ;
Stowell, Grace Sterling ;
Landers, Stewart J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (01) :118-122
[9]   Fertility options in transgender people [J].
De Roo, Chloe ;
Tilleman, Kelly ;
T'Sjoen, Guy ;
De Sutter, Petra .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 28 (01) :112-119
[10]   Gender reassignment and assisted reproduction - Present and future reproductive options for transsexual people [J].
De Sutter, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (04) :612-614