Testing the predictive power of an instrument titled "Orientation to School Renewal"

被引:4
作者
Shen, Jianping [1 ]
Ma, Xin [2 ]
Mansberger, Nancy [1 ]
Gao, Xingyuan [3 ]
Palmer, Louann Bierlein [1 ]
Burt, Walter [1 ]
Leneway, Robert [1 ]
McCrumb, Dennis [1 ]
Poppink, Sue [1 ]
Reeves, Patricia [1 ]
Whitten, Elizabeth [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Educ Leadership Res & Technol, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Educ Sch & Counseling Psychol, Lexington, KY USA
[3] East China Normal Univ, Dept Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Western Michigan Univ, Special Educ & Literacy Studies, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
关键词
School reform; instrument development; school renewal; STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT; COLLABORATIVE LEADERSHIP; TEACHER COLLABORATION; IMPACT; REFORM; MODEL; ACCOUNTABILITY; IMPROVEMENT; DISTRICT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/09243453.2020.1749087
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Policy makers, school practitioners, and scholars around the world have been searching for better school improvement models. The purpose of this study was to understand how an instrument we developed, Orientation to School Renewal, can be used to predict school-level academic achievement. We used the instrument to predict the academic performance of 83 schools as measured by the Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) and the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT) for mathematics and language. We found our instrument was more sensitive to M-STEP. We found that school renewal efforts were able to predict school academic performance with M-STEP in both mathematics and language. The three leading dimensions for predicting achievement on M-STEP were (a) focus on students and their achievement, (b) internal responsibility, and (c) continuous improvement. The renewal model provides a new perspective on school improvement, and future studies in other countries and international settings are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 528
页数:24
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [51] Hopkins D., 1997, SCH LEADERSHIP MANAG, V17, P401
  • [52] Hulleman CS., 2009, J RES EDUC EFF, V2, P88, DOI [10.1080/19345740802539325, DOI 10.1080/19345740802539325]
  • [53] Jimerson J.B., 2013, Current Issues in Education, V16, P1
  • [54] JOYCE B, 1995, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V52, P51
  • [55] Joyce B., 1993, SELF RENEWING SCH
  • [56] Kline P., 1998, 10 STEPS LEARNING OR
  • [57] The impact of data use professional development on student achievement
    Lai, M. K.
    McNaughton, S.
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2016, 60 : 434 - 443
  • [58] The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes
    Lee, J
    Wong, KK
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2004, 41 (04) : 797 - 832
  • [59] Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy
    Leithwood, Kenneth
    Jantzi, Doris
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 2008, 44 (04) : 496 - 528
  • [60] Testing a Conception of How School Leadership Influences Student Learning
    Leithwood, Kenneth
    Patten, Sarah
    Jantzi, Doris
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 46 (05) : 671 - 706