How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation

被引:24
作者
Frich, Jonas [1 ]
Nouwens, Midas [2 ]
Halskov, Kim [3 ]
Dalsgaard, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Digital Creat, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Digital Design & Informat Studies, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, CAVI, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
CHI '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS | 2021年
关键词
Creativity; Divergent thinking; Convergent Thinking; Creativity Support Tools;
D O I
10.1145/3411764.3445062
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Digital tools that support creative activities are ubiquitous in the design industry, yet practitioners appear to prefer pen and paper for design ideation. To better understand this exception, we conducted a comparative study between analog and digital tools and their impact on the divergent and convergent thinking patterns of groups of designers. We analysed how 24 participants solved comparable design ideation tasks in two conditions using linkographic protocol analysis - a notation method that focuses on identifying and linking small steps in the design process called moves. Our findings suggest that digital ideation tools yield more convergent thinking compared to analog tools, with no discernible impact on general productivity or divergent thinking.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, P UIST 01
[2]  
Bilda Z., 2003, Design Studies, V24, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7
[3]   How Time Constraints in a Creativity Support Tool Affect the Creative Writing Experience [J].
Biskjaer, Michael Mose ;
Frich, Jonas ;
Vermeulen, Lindsay MacDonald ;
Remy, Christian ;
Dalsgaard, Peter .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS: DESIGN FOR COGNITION (ECCE 2019), 2019, :100-107
[4]   Understanding Creativity Methods in Design [J].
Biskjaer, Michael Mose ;
Dalsgaard, Peter ;
Halskov, Kim .
DIS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS, 2017, :839-851
[5]  
British Design Council, 2005, DES PROC DOUBL DIAM
[6]  
Cahoon Sean M. P., 2020, U S Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR, P1
[7]   Re-examining prominent measures of divergent and convergent creativity [J].
Cortes, Robert A. ;
Weinberger, Adam B. ;
Daker, Richard J. ;
Green, Adam E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2019, 27 :90-93
[8]   In praise of convergent thinking [J].
Cropley, Arthur .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2006, 18 (03) :391-404
[9]  
Dalsgaard P., 2019, Sticky creativity, P155, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00007-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00007-0]
[10]  
Dalsgaard P., 2020, Sticky creativity, P155, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00007-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00007-0]