Analyze Collaborative Search History for Online Query Suggestion by Applying Re-Ranking Algorithm

被引:0
作者
Anpat, Jyoti [1 ]
Gangarde, Rupali [2 ]
机构
[1] Akurdi Savitribai Phule Pune Univ, DY Patil Coll Engn, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[2] Pune Symbiosis Int Univ, Symbiosis Inst Technol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
来源
2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR CONVERGENCE IN TECHNOLOGY (I2CT) | 2018年
关键词
Collaborative Search History; Dynamic Clustering; Online Query Suggestion; Query; Click Graph; Reformulation Graph; Query Fusion Graph; Re-Ranking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Web search engine pursued popularity by providing real time search results to the user while seeking of information. To investigate search result query suggestion has become the most important feature of web search engine. List of suggested queries provides the previously searched and related search results for the current search state of user. Information for any particular topic is searched by the user on the web is still in the form of queries (i.e. keywords). Keyword based query similarity faces the problem of semantic ambiguity. Graph based similarity method solves a problem of semantic ambiguity. Suggested queries are set of recommended (i.e. related) queries collected according to the similarity relevance value by analyzing search history. Dynamic clustering algorithm resolves a problem of K-Means by providing flexibility to increase the number of clusters as data object points increases. Suggested queries may vary their position in a query suggestion group, according to the relevance value calculated by relevance algorithm. Graph based similarity check method collects set of suggested queries for the currently searching query by analyzing collaborative search history. The Comparative result calculated with precision, recall and F-Measure show re-ranking algorithm gives higher accuracy than online query suggestion method.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Online clustering algorithms
    Barbakh, Wesam
    Fyfe, Colin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 18 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [2] Beeferman D., 2000, Proceedings. KDD-2000. Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P407, DOI 10.1145/347090.347176
  • [3] A Survey of Monte Carlo Tree Search Methods
    Browne, Cameron B.
    Powley, Edward
    Whitehouse, Daniel
    Lucas, Simon M.
    Cowling, Peter I.
    Rohlfshagen, Philipp
    Tavener, Stephen
    Perez, Diego
    Samothrakis, Spyridon
    Colton, Simon
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND AI IN GAMES, 2012, 4 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [4] Huvanandana J, 2016, 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (BME-HUST), P18, DOI 10.1109/BME-HUST.2016.7782086
  • [5] Organizing User Search Histories
    Hwang, Heasoo
    Lauw, Hady W.
    Getoor, Lise
    Ntoulas, Alexandros
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2012, 24 (05) : 912 - 925
  • [6] Kapugama KDCG, 2016, INT CONF ADV ICT, P168, DOI 10.1109/ICTER.2016.7829915
  • [7] Quanhua Liu, 2012, 2012 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS), P59, DOI 10.1109/RWS.2012.6175295
  • [8] Siti Salwa Salleh D. M., 2012, IJCSI INT J COMPUTER, V9
  • [9] Intent Based Clustering of Search Engine Query Log
    Veilumuthu, Ashok
    Ramachandran, Parthasarathy
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, : 647 - 652