TRIAD VII: Do Prehospital Providers Understand Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Documents?

被引:30
|
作者
Mirarchi, Ferdinando L. [1 ]
Cammarata, Christopher [1 ]
Zerkle, Samuel W. [1 ]
Cooney, Timothy E. [1 ]
Chenault, Jason [1 ]
Basnak, David [1 ]
机构
[1] UPMC Hamot, Dept Emergency Med, Erie, PA 16550 USA
关键词
Pennsylvania; prehospital; POLST; DNR; confusion; patient safety; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; TREATMENT PROGRAM; RESUSCITATE ORDERS; NURSING FACILITY; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; OREGON; REGISTRY; PATIENT; HOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PTS.0000000000000164
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documents are medical orders intended to honor patient choice in the hospital and prehospital settings. We hypothesized that prehospital personnel will find these forms confusing. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether POLST documents accord consensus in determining code status and treatment decisions among emergency medical services providers on the basis of an Internet survey. Consensus in this context reflects content clarity. Methods: A statewide survey of Pennsylvania emergency medical technicians and paramedics was conducted from October 2013 to January 2014. Respondents supplied code status and treatment decisions for scenarios involving critically ill patients who present with POLST documents and then develop cardiac arrest. The gamut of combinations of resuscitations (do not resuscitate [DNR], cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and treatment (full, limited, comfort measures) was represented. Subgroup analysis was done using the Fisher exact test with a Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.017 as significant. We defined consensus as a supermajority of 95%. Results: Response to the survey was 18.4% (1069/5800). For scenarios specifying DNR and full or limited treatment, most chose DNR (59%-84%) and 25% to 75% chose resuscitation. With DNR and comfort measures specified, approximately 85% selected DNR and withheld resuscitation. When cardiopulmonary resuscitation/full treatment was presented, 95% selected "full code" and resuscitation. Respondent age significantly affected response rates (P = 0.004); prior POLST education had no impact. For most scenarios, responses failed to attain consensus, suggesting confusion in interpretation of the form. Conclusions: In the Pennsylvania prehospital setting, POLST documents can be confusing, presenting a risk to patient safety. Additional research, standardized education, training, and/or safeguards are required to facilitate patient choice and protect safety.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of a Novel Electronic Health Record-Embedded Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment System
    Dana M. Zive
    Jennifer Cook
    Charissa Yang
    David Sibell
    Susan W. Tolle
    Michael Lieberman
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2016, 40
  • [42] Maryland's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form Use: Reports of a Statewide Survey
    Tarzian, Anita J.
    Cheevers, Nadia B.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (09) : 939 - 945
  • [43] Evaluation of a Video Decision Aid to Reduce Decisional Conflict in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Decision-Making
    Gallegos, Jarred V.
    Edelstein, Barry
    Moss, Alvin H.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 35 (04) : 243 - 247
  • [44] Impact of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Program Maturity Status on the Nursing Home Resident's Place of Death
    Tark, Aluem
    Agarwal, Mansi
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Song, Jiyoun
    Stone, Patricia W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (07) : 812 - 822
  • [45] Preparation and Practice of the Necessary Documents in Hospital for the "Act on Decision of Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life"
    Baek, Sun Kyung
    Kim, Hwa Jung
    Kwon, Jung Hye
    Lee, Ha Yeon
    Won, Young-Woong
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Baik, Sujin
    Ryu, Hyewon
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 53 (04): : 926 - 934
  • [46] Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study
    Lee, Song-, I
    Ju, Ye-Rin
    Kang, Da Hyun
    Lee, Jeong Eun
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [47] Care preferences in physician orders for life sustaining treatment in California nursing homes
    Jennings, Lee A.
    Wenger, Neil S.
    Li-Jung Liang
    Parikh, Punam
    Powell, David
    Escarce, Jose J.
    Zingmond, David S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (07) : 2040 - 2050
  • [48] Reducing Discrepancy Between Code Status Orders and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Therapies: Results of a Quality Improvement Initiative
    Lake, Rachel Elisabeth
    Franks, Lori
    Meisenberg, Barry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 37 (07) : 532 - 536
  • [49] Paramedic use of the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for medical intervention and transportation decisions
    Breyre, Amelia M.
    Sporer, Karl A.
    Davenport, Glen
    Isaacs, Eric
    Glomb, Nicolaus W.
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [50] Completion rate of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a preliminary, cross-sectional study
    Ju Won Kim
    Jung Yoon Choi
    Won Jin Jang
    Yoon Ji Choi
    Youn Seon Choi
    Sang Won Shin
    Yeul Hong Kim
    Kyong Hwa Park
    BMC Palliative Care, 18