TRIAD VII: Do Prehospital Providers Understand Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Documents?

被引:30
|
作者
Mirarchi, Ferdinando L. [1 ]
Cammarata, Christopher [1 ]
Zerkle, Samuel W. [1 ]
Cooney, Timothy E. [1 ]
Chenault, Jason [1 ]
Basnak, David [1 ]
机构
[1] UPMC Hamot, Dept Emergency Med, Erie, PA 16550 USA
关键词
Pennsylvania; prehospital; POLST; DNR; confusion; patient safety; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; TREATMENT PROGRAM; RESUSCITATE ORDERS; NURSING FACILITY; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; OREGON; REGISTRY; PATIENT; HOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PTS.0000000000000164
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documents are medical orders intended to honor patient choice in the hospital and prehospital settings. We hypothesized that prehospital personnel will find these forms confusing. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether POLST documents accord consensus in determining code status and treatment decisions among emergency medical services providers on the basis of an Internet survey. Consensus in this context reflects content clarity. Methods: A statewide survey of Pennsylvania emergency medical technicians and paramedics was conducted from October 2013 to January 2014. Respondents supplied code status and treatment decisions for scenarios involving critically ill patients who present with POLST documents and then develop cardiac arrest. The gamut of combinations of resuscitations (do not resuscitate [DNR], cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and treatment (full, limited, comfort measures) was represented. Subgroup analysis was done using the Fisher exact test with a Bonferroni-corrected P = 0.017 as significant. We defined consensus as a supermajority of 95%. Results: Response to the survey was 18.4% (1069/5800). For scenarios specifying DNR and full or limited treatment, most chose DNR (59%-84%) and 25% to 75% chose resuscitation. With DNR and comfort measures specified, approximately 85% selected DNR and withheld resuscitation. When cardiopulmonary resuscitation/full treatment was presented, 95% selected "full code" and resuscitation. Respondent age significantly affected response rates (P = 0.004); prior POLST education had no impact. For most scenarios, responses failed to attain consensus, suggesting confusion in interpretation of the form. Conclusions: In the Pennsylvania prehospital setting, POLST documents can be confusing, presenting a risk to patient safety. Additional research, standardized education, training, and/or safeguards are required to facilitate patient choice and protect safety.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRIAD VI: How Well Do Emergency Physicians Understand Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Forms?
    Mirarchi, Ferdinando L.
    Doshi, Ankur A.
    Zerkle, Samuel W.
    Cooney, Timothy E.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2015, 11 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [2] Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment for nursing home residents with dementia
    Kim, Hyejin
    Ersek, Mary
    Bradway, Christine
    Hickman, Susan E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2015, 27 (11) : 606 - 614
  • [3] Surrogate Preferences on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form
    Chen, Elizabeth E.
    Pu, Charles T.
    Bernacki, Rachelle E.
    Ragland, Julia
    Schwartz, Jonathon H.
    Mutchler, Jan E.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2019, 59 (05) : 811 - 821
  • [4] Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms Completed in Nursing Homes
    Rahman, Anna N.
    Bressette, Matthew
    Enguidanos, Susan
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (05) : 538 - 541
  • [5] To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?
    Lovadini, Gustavo B.
    Fukushima, Fernanda B.
    Schoueri, Joao F. L.
    dos Reis, Roberto
    Fonseca, Cecilia G. F.
    Rodriguez, Jahaira J. C.
    Coelho, Cauana S.
    Neves, Adriele F.
    Rodrigues, Aniela M.
    Marques, Marina A.
    Bassett, Rick
    Steinberg, Karl E.
    Moss, Alvin H.
    Vidal, Edison I. O.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (02) : 334 - +
  • [6] The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study
    Hickman, Susan E.
    Hammes, Bernard J.
    Torke, Alexia M.
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Sachs, Greg A.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [7] Implementation of Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment
    Evans, Janette N.
    Ball, Lisa S.
    Wicher, Camille P.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [8] Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Hickman, Susan E.
    Keevern, Elisabeth
    Hammes, Bernard J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [9] Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment and Emergency Medicine: Ethical Considerations, Legal Issues, and Emerging Trends
    Jesus, John E.
    Geiderman, Joel M.
    Venkat, Arvind
    Limehouse, Walter E., Jr.
    Derse, Arthur R.
    Larkin, Gregory L.
    Henrichs, Charles W., III
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 64 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [10] RE: THE OREGON PHYSICIAN ORDERS FOR LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT REGISTRY
    Mirarchi, Ferdinando
    Cammarata, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (02) : 215 - 217