Landslide susceptibility mapping at Gongliu county, China using artificial neural network and weight of evidence models

被引:23
作者
Wang, Qiqing [1 ]
Li, Wenping [1 ]
Xing, Maolin [1 ]
Wu, Yanli [1 ]
Pei, Yabing [1 ]
Yang, Dongdong [1 ]
Bai, Hanying [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Resources & Earth Sci, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
[2] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Earth Sci, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide; susceptibility mapping; artificial neural network (ANN); weight of evidence (WoE); China; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; BINARY LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; LIKELIHOOD-FREQUENCY RATIO; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; HOA BINH PROVINCE; CERTAINTY FACTOR; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FUZZY-LOGIC; ENTROPY MODELS; DECISION-TREE;
D O I
10.1007/s12303-016-0003-3
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to apply and to verify the use of artificial neural network (ANN) and weight of evidence (WoE) models to landslide susceptibility mapping in the Gongliu county, China, using a geographic information system (GIS). For this aim, in this study, a landslide inventory map was prepared using earlier reports and aerial photographs as well as by carrying out field surveys. A total of 163 landslides (70% out of 233 detected landslides) were randomly selected for model training, and the remaining 70 landslides (30%) were used for the model validation. Then, a total number of twelve landslide conditioning factors, such as slope angle, slope aspect, general curvature, plan curvature, profile curvature, altitude, distance to rivers, distance to roads, lithology, rainfall, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and sediment transport index (STI), were used in the analysis. Landslide hazardous areas were analyzed and mapped using the landslide-occurrence factors by ANN and WoE models. Finally the output maps were validated using the area under the curve (AUC) method. The validation results showed that the ANN model with a success rate of 82.51% and predictive accuracy of 77.31% performs better than WoE (success rate, 79.82%; predictive accuracy, 74.59%) model. Overall, both models showed almost similar results. Therefore, the two landslide susceptibility maps obtained were successful and can be useful for preliminary general land use planning and hazard mitigation purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 718
页数:14
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Agterberg F.P, 1993, COMPUTERS GEOLOGY, V25, P13
[2]  
Ahmed B., 2014, LANDSLIDES, V12, P1
[3]   An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm [J].
Akgun, A. ;
Sezer, E. A. ;
Nefeslioglu, H. A. ;
Gokceoglu, C. ;
Pradhan, B. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 38 (01) :23-34
[4]   Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models [J].
Akgun, Aykut ;
Dag, Serhat ;
Bulut, Fikri .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) :1127-1143
[5]   A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey [J].
Akgun, Aykut .
LANDSLIDES, 2012, 9 (01) :93-106
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[7]   Weights of evidence method for landslide susceptibility mapping. Prahova Subcarpathians, Romania [J].
Armas, Iuliana .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 60 (03) :937-950
[8]   The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan [J].
Ayalew, L ;
Yamagishi, H .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) :15-31
[9]  
Bagher-Ebadian H., 2009, Proceedings 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2009 - Atlanta), P229, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5178883
[10]  
Biswajeet Pradhan, 2007, [地学前缘, Earth Science Frontiers], V14, P143, DOI 10.1016/S1872-5791(08)60008-1