The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor

被引:9
作者
De Ceulaer, Geert [1 ]
Pascoal, David [1 ]
Vanpoucke, Filiep [2 ]
Govaerts, Paul J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eargroup, Herentalsebaan 75, B-2100 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] CTCE, Mechelen, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, ENT Dept, Ghent, Belgium
[4] VU Free Univ Amsterdam, Language Hearing Ctr, Dept Language Literature & Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cochlear implant; wireless; directional microphone; speech perception; noise; assistive listening devices; REMOTE-MICROPHONE; IMPLANT PROCESSOR; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2017.1346305
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The newest Nucleus CI processor, the CP900, has two new options to improve speech-in-noise perception: (1) use of an adaptive directional microphone (SCAN mode) and (2) wireless connection to MiniMic1 and MiniMic2 wireless remote microphones. Design: An analysis was made of the absolute and relative benefits of these technologies in a real-world mimicking test situation. Speech perception was tested using an adaptive speech-in-noise test (sentences-in-babble noise). In session A, SRTs were measured in three conditions: (1) Clinical Map, (2) SCAN and (3) MiniMic1. Each was assessed for three distances between speakers and CI recipient: 1 m, 2 m and 3 m. In session B, the benefit of the use of MiniMic2 was compared to benefit of MiniMic1 at 3 m. Study sample: A group of 13 adult CP900 recipients participated. Results: SCAN and MiniMic1 improved performance compared to the standard microphone with a median improvement in SRT of 2.7-3.9 dB for SCAN at 1 m and 3 m, respectively, and 4.7-10.9 dB for the MiniMic1. MiniMic1 improvements were significant. MiniMic2 showed an improvement in SRT of 22.2 dB compared to 10.0 dB for MiniMic1 (3 m). Conclusions: Digital wireless transmission systems (i.e. MiniMic) offer a statistically and clinically significant improvement in speech perception in challenging, realistic listening conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 843
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, HEARING J, DOI DOI 10.1097/01.HJ.0000292903.94045.F6
  • [2] Battmer R. D., 2014, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS IN, V16, P100
  • [3] Buechner A, 2014, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS IN, V16, P39
  • [4] De Ceulaer Geert, 2015, Cochlear Implants Int, V16, P222, DOI 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000097
  • [5] Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing
    Fu, QJ
    Shannon, RV
    Wang, XS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (06) : 3586 - 3596
  • [6] Govaerts P J, 2006, Cochlear Implants Int, V7, P92, DOI 10.1179/146701006807508106
  • [7] Development of a Software Tool Using Deterministic Logic for the Optimization of Cochlear Implant Processor Programming
    Govaerts, Paul J.
    Vaerenberg, Bart
    De Ceulaer, Geert
    Daemers, Kristin
    De Beukelaer, Carina
    Schauwers, Karen
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (06) : 908 - 918
  • [8] Hoffmann J., 2014, E83101 COCHL BON ANC
  • [9] Jespersen C. T., 2016, BENEFIT RESOUND MULT
  • [10] Jespersen C. T., 2011, RESOUND UNITE MINI M