No difference in learning outcomes and usability between using controllers and hand tracking during a virtual reality endotracheal intubation training for medical students in Thailand

被引:11
作者
Khundam, Chaowanan [1 ]
Sukkriang, Naparat [2 ]
Noel, Frederic [3 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Informat Innovat Ctr Excellence IICE, Sch Informat, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[2] Walailak Univ, Sch Med, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Inst Engn, Grenoble, France
关键词
Endotracheal intubation; Learning; Medical education; Personal satisfaction; Virtual reality;
D O I
10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.22
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: We developed a virtual reality (VR) endotracheal intubation training that applied 2 interaction modalities (hand-tracking or controllers). It aimed to investigate the differences in usability between using hand tracking and controllers during the VR intervention for intubation training for medical students from February 2021 to March 2021 in Thailand. Methods: Forty-five participants were divided into 3 groups: video only, video with VR controller training, and video with VR hand tracking training. Pre-test, post-test, and practice scores were used to assess learning outcomes. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ) questionnaires were used to evaluate the differences between the VR groups. The sample comprised 45 medical students (undergraduate) who were taking part in clinical training at Walailak University in Thailand. Results: The overall learning outcomes of both VR groups were better than those of the video group. The post-test scores (P=0.581) and practice scores (P=0.168) of both VR groups were not significantly different. Similarly, no significant between-group differences were found in the SUS scores (P=0.588) or in any aspects of the USEQ scores. Conclusion: VR enhanced medical training. Interactions using hand tracking or controllers were not significantly different in terms of the outcomes measured in this study. The results and interviews provided a better understanding of support learning and training, which will be further improved and developed to create a self-learning VR medical training system in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Brooke J, 2013, J USABILITY STUD, V8, P29
[2]   Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Hamstra, Stanley J. ;
Brydges, Ryan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Szostek, Jason H. ;
Wang, Amy T. ;
Erwin, Patricia J. ;
Hatala, Rose .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (01) :E844-E875
[3]   USEQ: A Short Questionnaire for Satisfaction Evaluation of Virtual Rehabilitation Systems [J].
Gil-Gomez, Jose-Antonio ;
Manzano-Hernandez, Pilar ;
Albiol-Perez, Sergio ;
Aula-Valero, Carmen ;
Gil-Gomez, Hermenegildo ;
Lozano-Quilis, Jose-Antonio .
SENSORS, 2017, 17 (07)
[4]  
LaValle S.M., 2016, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON
[5]  
Li Y., 2019, Virtual Reality Intelligent Hardware, V1, P84, DOI DOI 10.3724/SP.J.2096-5796.2018.0006
[6]   Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lorello, G. R. ;
Cook, D. A. ;
Johnson, R. L. ;
Brydges, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 112 (02) :231-245
[7]  
Pottle Jack, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P181, DOI 10.7861/fhj.2019-0036
[8]   Airway management education: simulation based training versus non-simulation based training-A systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
Sun, Yanxia ;
Pan, Chuxiong ;
Li, Tianzuo ;
Gan, Tong J. .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
[9]   Effect of virtual reality training to decreases rates of needle stick/sharp injuries in new-coming medical and nursing interns in Taiwan [J].
Wu, Szu-Hsien ;
Huang, Chia-Chang ;
Huang, Shiau-Shian ;
Yang, Ying-Ying ;
Liu, Chih-Wei ;
Shulruf, Boaz ;
Chen, Chen-Huan .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2020, 17