EIA screening and nature protection in Denmark

被引:15
作者
Christensen, Per [1 ]
Kornov, Lone [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Dev & Planning, DK-9220 Aalborg OE, Denmark
关键词
Livestock; Environmental impact assessment screening; EIA; Natura; 2000; Implementation theory; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The number of environmental impact assessment (EIA) screenings in Denmark has increased dramatically since 2000. This is a consequence of increased pig production as well as the concentration of production on larger farms. In the same period. EIA rules have developed primarily due to an increased focus on the protection of groundwater and Natura 2000 sites. In particular, the implementation of Natura 2000 in Danish legislation has increased the demands on many farms. In its rulings on appealed cases, the Nature Protection Board of Appeal has strengthened its demands, and this is mirrored in screening practices. In this paper, the demands formulated in the guidelines of local authorities were analysed in order to investigate how the protection of groundwater, coastal waters, lakes and Natura 2000 sites develops through EIA screening. It is concluded that the level of protection has improved, and that the main cause for this is not EIA regulations as such, but the positive role which the implementation of the Natura 2000 objectives has played in this development. However, it was also found that the formulation of demands varies greatly between the counties, thus often resulting in ambiguity and leaving room for quite different practices in different counties. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1103
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV ISS OPT
[2]  
Badr El-Sayed A., 2004, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, V6, P19, DOI 10.1142/S1464333204001572
[3]  
Baier V., 1986, SCANDINAVIAN J MANAG, V2, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0281-7527(86)90016-2, 10.1016/0281-7527(86)90016-2]
[4]  
Benson JF., 2003, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V21, P261, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154603781766185
[5]  
Beunen R., 2006, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V49, P605, DOI [10.1080/09640560600747547, DOI 10.1080/09640560600747547]
[6]  
Cashmore M., 2004, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V22, P295, DOI [DOI 10.3152/147154604781765860, 10.3152/147154604781765860]
[7]  
Christensen P., 2005, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V48, P393, DOI 10.1080/09640560500067491
[8]   Danish experiences on EIA of livestock projects [J].
Christensen, Per .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2006, 26 (05) :468-480
[9]  
European Communities, 2001, GUID EIA SCREEN
[10]   Local government and nature conservation in Norway: decentralisation as a strategy in environmental policy [J].
Falleth, Eva Irene ;
Hovik, Sissel .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (03) :221-231