The ultrafiltration coefficient of a dialyser (KUF) is not a fixed value, and it follows a parabolic function: the new concept of KUF max

被引:23
作者
Ficheux, Alain [1 ]
Kerr, Peter G. [2 ]
Brunet, Philippe [3 ]
Argiles, Angel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Natl Super Chim, RD Nephrol, F-34090 Montpellier, France
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Univ Aix Marseille, Hop La Conception, Serv Nephrol, F-13005 Marseille, France
[4] Ctr Dialyse Sete Nephrol Dialyse St Guilhem, F-34204 Sete, France
关键词
membrane permeability; physics of dialysis; ultrafiltration coefficient; HOLLOW-FIBER DIALYZERS; ONLINE HEMODIAFILTRATION; HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS; CRITICAL FLUX; MEMBRANE; BLOOD; MORTALITY; REMOVAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfq510
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Hydraulic permeability (KUF) is an intrinsic characteristic of dialysers, reported by the manufacturer as a single value, which drives and limits fluid removal. High-flux dialysers have been introduced with the appearance of convective techniques, aiming to increase fluid and solute removal. High convective volumes are being employed, although their advantages have not been fully demonstrated. Methods. We assessed KUF over a pre-selected range of ultrafiltration rates (QUF) in post-dilutional haemodiafiltration and high-flux haemodialysis. Results. KUF vs QUF was neither a fixed value nor a linear function but followed a parabolic function with a vertex der (y) = 0, which we have called KUF max. This also held true in high-flux routine dialysis. Conclusions. These findings are completely new and have clear applications in clinics. The vertex point might be used to define the optimal QUF of a dialysis system, which would be that obtained at KUF max and corresponds to the best QUF/transmembrane pressure ratio, as opposed to the maximum QUF (which corresponds to the highest possible QUF), frequently associated with haemoconcentration, clotting, loss in dialyser surface area, and treatment problems. Determining KUF max in vivo could be of help in dialysis prescription and control with automatic systems.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 640
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Blatt W.F., 1970, Membrane Science and Technology, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-1851-4_4
[2]  
Clark WR, 2007, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V158, P20, DOI 10.1159/000107232
[3]   Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Beck, GJ ;
Cheung, AK ;
Daugirdas, JT ;
Greene, T ;
Kusek, JW ;
Allon, M ;
Bailey, J ;
Delmez, JA ;
Depner, TA ;
Dwyer, JT ;
Levey, AS ;
Levin, NW ;
Milford, E ;
Ornt, DB ;
Rocco, MV ;
Schulman, G ;
Schwab, SJ ;
Teehan, BP ;
Toto, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (25) :2010-2019
[4]   In vitro evaluation of the hydraulic permeability of polysulfone dialysers [J].
Eloot, S ;
De Wachter, D ;
Vienken, J ;
Pohlmeier, R ;
Verdonck, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2002, 25 (03) :210-216
[5]   On an experimental method to measure critical flux in ultrafiltration [J].
Espinasse, B ;
Bacchin, P ;
Aimar, P .
DESALINATION, 2002, 146 (1-3) :91-96
[6]   Effect of the dialysis membrane on mortality of chronic hemodialysis patients [J].
Hakim, RM ;
Held, PJ ;
Stannard, DC ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Port, FK ;
Daugirdas, JT ;
Agodoa, L .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 50 (02) :566-570
[7]  
HENDERSO.LW, 1967, T AM SOC ART INT ORG, V13, P216
[8]  
Henderson Lee W., 1996, P114, DOI 10.1007/978-0-585-36947-1_4
[9]  
HENDERSON LW, 1975, J LAB CLIN MED, V85, P372
[10]   COMPARISON OF HEMODIALYSIS AND HEMODIAFILTRATION - A LONG-TERM LONGITUDINAL-STUDY [J].
KERR, PB ;
ARGILES, A ;
FLAVIER, JL ;
CANAUD, B ;
MION, CM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 41 (04) :1035-1040