Timing of Pegfilgrastim: Association with Febrile Neutropenia in a Pediatric Solid and CNS Tumor Population

被引:2
作者
Schlenker, Laura [1 ]
Manworren, Renee C. B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ann Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Dept Nursing, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 30, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
pediatric; chemotherapy; growth factor; febrile neutropenia; solid tumors; SAME-DAY; MYELOSUPPRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; DOSE INTENSITY; CANCER; SAFETY; PROPHYLAXIS; CHILDREN; PREVENTION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/10434542211037729
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: While recommended timing of pegfilgrastim administration is >= 24 h after chemotherapy, patient barriers to next day administration, available adult evidence, and pharmacokinetic data have led to earlier administration in some pediatric patients with solid and central nervous system tumors. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes by timing of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review examined timing of 932 pegfilgrastim administrations to 182 patients, 0-29 years of age. The primary outcome was febrile neutropenia (FN); the secondary outcome was neutropenic delays (ND) >= 7 days to next chemotherapy cycle. To account for multiple pegfilgrastim administrations per patient, a generalized mixed model was used with a logit link for the dichotomous outcomes (FN & ND), timing as the dichotomous independent variable, and random effect for patient. Results: FN occurred in 196 of 916 cycles (21.4%); and ND in 19 of 805 cycles (2.4%). The fixed effect of pegfilgrastim administration < or >= 24 h after chemotherapy was not significant, p = .50; however, earlier or later than 20 h was significant, p = .005. FN odds were significantly higher when pegfilgrastim was given <20 h (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.19-2.65) after chemotherapy, which may be attributable to differences in chemotherapy toxicity regardless of pegfilgrastim timing. Discussion: While attempts should be made to administer pegfilgrastim >= 24 h after chemotherapy, if barriers exist, modified timing based on individual patient characteristics should be considered. Prospective randomized trials are needed to identify lower risk patients for early pegfilgrastim administration.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 384
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations
    Aapro, Matti
    Boccia, Ralph
    Leonard, Robert
    Camps, Carlos
    Campone, Mario
    Choquet, Sylvain
    Danova, Marco
    Glaspy, John
    Hus, Iwona
    Link, Hartmut
    Sliwa, Thamer
    Tesch, Hans
    Valero, Vicente
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (11) : 3295 - 3304
  • [2] Amgen, 2020, PEGF FULL PRESCR IN
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Andre, Nicolas
    El Kababri, Maria
    Bertrand, Pourroy
    Rome, Angelique
    Coze, Carole
    Gentet, Jean Claude
    Bernard, Jean Louis
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2007, 18 (03) : 277 - 281
  • [4] Evaluation of the Hematologic Safety of Same Day Versus Standard Administration (24-to 72-Hour Delay) of Pegfilgrastim in Gynecology Oncology Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
    Billingsley, Caroline C.
    Jacobson, Samuel N.
    Crafton, Sarah M.
    Crim, Aleia K.
    Li, Quan
    Hade, Erinn M.
    Cohn, David E.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    Copeland, Larry J.
    Salani, Ritu
    Backes, Floor J.
    O'Malley, David M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) : 1331 - 1336
  • [5] Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Associated Neutropenia in Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors
    Borinstein, Scott C.
    Pollard, Jessica
    Winter, Laura
    Hawkins, Douglas S.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2009, 53 (03) : 375 - 378
  • [6] Randomized Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim after Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy in Young Adults and Children with Sarcomas
    Fox, Elizabeth
    Widemann, Brigitte C.
    Hawkins, Douglas S.
    Jayaprakash, Nalini
    Dagher, Ramzi
    Aikin, Alberta A.
    Bernstein, Donna
    Long, Lauren
    Mackall, Crystal
    Helman, Lee
    Steinberg, Seth M.
    Balis, Frank M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (23) : 7361 - 7367
  • [7] Core Outcomes and Definitions for Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Research: A Consensus Statement From an International Panel
    Haeusler, Gabrielle M.
    Phillips, Robert S.
    Lehrnbecher, Thomas
    Thursky, Karin A.
    Sung, Lillian
    Ammann, Roland A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2015, 62 (03) : 483 - 489
  • [8] Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy
    Li, Yanli
    Klippel, Zandra
    Shih, Xiaolong
    Wang, Hong
    Reiner, Maureen
    Page, John H.
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 77 (04) : 703 - 712
  • [9] The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a systematic review
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Allcott, Kim
    Garcia, Jacob
    Stryker, Scott
    Li, Yanli
    Reiner, Maureen T.
    Weycker, Derek
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (08) : 2619 - 2629
  • [10] Impact of Chemotherapy Dose Intensity on Cancer Patient Outcomes
    Lyman, Gary H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2009, 7 (01): : 99 - 108