Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK

被引:37
作者
Evans, M. [1 ]
Wolden, M. [2 ]
Gundgaard, J. [2 ]
Chubb, B. [3 ]
Christensen, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, S Glam, Wales
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, W Sussex, England
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Insulin analogs; Insulin therapy; Nocturnal hypoglycemia; Pharmaco-economics; Type; 1; diabetes;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2014.971160
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) vs insulin glargine (IGlar) as part of a basal-bolus treatment regimen in adults with T1DM, using a short-term economic model. Methods: Data from two phase III clinical studies were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term model. The costs and effects of treatment with IDeg vs IGlar were calculated over a 12-month period. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the results. The main outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option vs IGlar in patients with T1DM on a basal-bolus regimen. The base case ICER was estimated at 16,895 pound/QALY, which is below commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in the UK. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was stable to variations in the majority of input parameters. The parameters that exerted the most influence on the ICER were hypoglycemia event rates, daily insulin dose, and disutility associated with non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events. However, even under extreme assumptions in the majority of analyses the ICERs remained below the commonly accepted threshold of 20,000- pound 30,000 pound per QALY gained. Conclusions: This short-term modeling approach accommodates the treat-to-target trial design required by regulatory bodies, and focuses on the impact of important aspects of insulin therapy such as hypoglycemia and dosing. For patients with T1DM who are treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option compared with IGlar. IDeg may be particularly cost-effective for sub-groups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent nocturnal hypoglycemia and those with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness and tolerability of treatment intensification to basal-bolus therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes on previous basal insulin-supported oral therapy with insulin glargine or supplementary insulin therapy with insulin glulisine: the PARTNER observational study
    Pfohl, Martin
    Siegmund, Thorsten
    Pscherer, Stefan
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Seufert, Jochen
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 569 - 578
  • [42] Cost-utility analysis of once-weekly insulin icodec and once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy in China
    Dai, Nan
    Su, Xiaorong
    Wang, Yong
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2025, 27 (01) : 377 - 386
  • [43] Basal-bolus or premixed? Shedding light on optimal insulin regime for type 1 diabetes
    Walton, Emma Louise
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 41 (06) : 337 - 339
  • [44] Insulin degludec is associated with less frequent and milder hypoglycemia in insulin-deficient patients with type 1 diabetes compared with insulin glargine or detemir
    Iwasaki S.
    Kozawa J.
    Kimura T.
    Fukui K.
    Iwahashi H.
    Imagawa A.
    Shimomura I.
    Diabetology International, 2017, 8 (2) : 228 - 236
  • [45] Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide and insulin degludec/insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes patients not controlled on basal insulin
    Jammah, Anwar Ali
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2021, 15 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China
    James L. Palmer
    Amélie Beaudet
    Jeremy White
    Juliette Plun-Favreau
    Jayne Smith-Palmer
    Advances in Therapy, 2010, 27 : 814 - 827
  • [47] Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Ádám G. Tabák
    John Anderson
    Pablo Aschner
    Minzhi Liu
    Aramesh Saremi
    Peter Stella
    Francisco J. Tinahones
    Carol Wysham
    Juris J. Meier
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 305 - 318
  • [48] Switching patients from insulin glargine-based basal-bolus regimens to a once daily insulin detemir-based basal-bolus regimen: results from a subgroup of the PREDICTIVE™ study
    Yenigun, M.
    Honka, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (03) : 425 - 432
  • [49] Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
    McCrimmon, Rory J.
    Palmer, Karen
    Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
    Lew, Elisheva
    Puttanna, Amar
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2022, 13 (06) : 1203 - 1214
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, modeling the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycemic control in Switzerland
    Braendie, M.
    Azoulay, M.
    Greiner, R. -A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 49 (03) : 217 - 230