Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK

被引:37
作者
Evans, M. [1 ]
Wolden, M. [2 ]
Gundgaard, J. [2 ]
Chubb, B. [3 ]
Christensen, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, S Glam, Wales
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, W Sussex, England
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Insulin analogs; Insulin therapy; Nocturnal hypoglycemia; Pharmaco-economics; Type; 1; diabetes;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2014.971160
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) vs insulin glargine (IGlar) as part of a basal-bolus treatment regimen in adults with T1DM, using a short-term economic model. Methods: Data from two phase III clinical studies were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term model. The costs and effects of treatment with IDeg vs IGlar were calculated over a 12-month period. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the results. The main outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option vs IGlar in patients with T1DM on a basal-bolus regimen. The base case ICER was estimated at 16,895 pound/QALY, which is below commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in the UK. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was stable to variations in the majority of input parameters. The parameters that exerted the most influence on the ICER were hypoglycemia event rates, daily insulin dose, and disutility associated with non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events. However, even under extreme assumptions in the majority of analyses the ICERs remained below the commonly accepted threshold of 20,000- pound 30,000 pound per QALY gained. Conclusions: This short-term modeling approach accommodates the treat-to-target trial design required by regulatory bodies, and focuses on the impact of important aspects of insulin therapy such as hypoglycemia and dosing. For patients with T1DM who are treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option compared with IGlar. IDeg may be particularly cost-effective for sub-groups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent nocturnal hypoglycemia and those with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Benefit of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Compared With Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy is Consistent Across Participant Subgroups With Type 2 Diabetes in the DUAL VII Randomized Trial
    Billings, Liana K.
    Agner, Bue F. Ross
    Altuntas, Yuksel
    Gron, Randi
    Halladin, Natalie
    Klonoff, David C.
    Tentolouris, Nikolaos
    Jodar, Esteban
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 15 (03): : 636 - 645
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of once daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide compared to bolus insulin both in combination with basal insulin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Norway
    Huetson, Pernilla
    Palmer, James L.
    Levorsen, Andree
    Fournier, Marie
    Germe, Maeva
    McLeod, Euan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 18 (08) : 573 - 585
  • [33] Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen for Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19 and Diabetes Mellitus: A Practical Approach
    Attri, Bhawna
    Goyal, Alpesh
    Gupta, Yashdeep
    Tandon, Nikhil
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (09) : 2177 - 2194
  • [34] Effects of Switching from Insulin Glargine or Detemir to Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    Kusunoki, Yoshiki
    Katsuno, Tomoyuki
    Miyakoshi, Kana
    Ikawa, Takashi
    Nakae, Rie
    Ochi, Fumihiro
    Tokuda, Masaru
    Akagami, Takafumi
    Murai, Kazuki
    Miuchi, Masayuki
    Hamaguchi, Tomoya
    Miyagawa, Jun-ichiro
    Namba, Mitsuyoshi
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2013, 4 (02) : 461 - 472
  • [35] Comparison of insulin lispro protamine suspension and insulin detemir in basal-bolus therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes
    Chacra, A. R.
    Kipnes, M.
    Ilag, L. L.
    Sarwat, S.
    Giaconia, J.
    Chan, J.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (05) : 563 - 569
  • [36] Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen for Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19 and Diabetes Mellitus: A Practical Approach
    Bhawna Attri
    Alpesh Goyal
    Yashdeep Gupta
    Nikhil Tandon
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 2177 - 2194
  • [37] Exenatide versus insulin glargine: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in patients with Type 2 diabetes in Switzerland
    Braendle, M.
    Erny-Albrecht, K. M.
    Goodall, G.
    Spinas, G. A.
    Streit, P.
    Valentine, W. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (08) : 501 - 515
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Canadian payer setting: modeling analysis
    Tunis, Sandra L.
    Minshall, Michael E.
    Conner, Christopher
    McCormick, John I.
    Kapor, Jovana
    Yale, Jean-Francois
    Groleau, Danielle
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (05) : 1273 - 1284
  • [39] Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL Versus Insulin Degludec for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Su, Wen
    Li, Chaoyun
    Zhang, Lei
    Lin, Ziyi
    Tan, Jun
    Xuan, Jianwei
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (05) : 1969 - 1984
  • [40] RAPID-ACTING INSULIN ANALOGUES IN BASAL-BOLUS REGIMENS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Garg, Satish
    Javier Ampudia-Blasco, Francisco
    Pfohl, Martin
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2010, 16 (03) : 486 - 505