Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK

被引:36
|
作者
Evans, M. [1 ]
Wolden, M. [2 ]
Gundgaard, J. [2 ]
Chubb, B. [3 ]
Christensen, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, S Glam, Wales
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, W Sussex, England
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Insulin analogs; Insulin therapy; Nocturnal hypoglycemia; Pharmaco-economics; Type; 1; diabetes;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2014.971160
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) vs insulin glargine (IGlar) as part of a basal-bolus treatment regimen in adults with T1DM, using a short-term economic model. Methods: Data from two phase III clinical studies were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term model. The costs and effects of treatment with IDeg vs IGlar were calculated over a 12-month period. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the results. The main outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option vs IGlar in patients with T1DM on a basal-bolus regimen. The base case ICER was estimated at 16,895 pound/QALY, which is below commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in the UK. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was stable to variations in the majority of input parameters. The parameters that exerted the most influence on the ICER were hypoglycemia event rates, daily insulin dose, and disutility associated with non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events. However, even under extreme assumptions in the majority of analyses the ICERs remained below the commonly accepted threshold of 20,000- pound 30,000 pound per QALY gained. Conclusions: This short-term modeling approach accommodates the treat-to-target trial design required by regulatory bodies, and focuses on the impact of important aspects of insulin therapy such as hypoglycemia and dosing. For patients with T1DM who are treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option compared with IGlar. IDeg may be particularly cost-effective for sub-groups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent nocturnal hypoglycemia and those with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SWITCHING TO INSULIN ASPART FROM HUMAN SOLUBLE INSULIN IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES ON A BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN
    Ji, Q. H.
    Ye, Q.
    Zhang, Y. Z.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A164 - A165
  • [12] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec vs. Insulin Glargine U100 in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a UK Setting
    Marc Evans
    Roopa Mehta
    Jens Gundgaard
    Barrie Chubb
    Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 1919 - 1930
  • [13] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec vs. Insulin Glargine U100 in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a UK Setting
    Evans, Marc
    Mehta, Roopa
    Gundgaard, Jens
    Chubb, Barrie
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (05) : 1919 - 1930
  • [14] Insulin Degludec: Reduction of Hypoglycemia during Basal-Bolus Therapy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 or 2
    Luedemann, J.
    Merker, L.
    Milek, K.
    Kaiser, M.
    Wilhelm, B.
    DIABETOLOGIE UND STOFFWECHSEL, 2013, 8 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [15] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
    Nebojša Lalić
    Monika Russel-Szymczyk
    Marina Culic
    Christian Klyver Tikkanen
    Barrie Chubb
    Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 1201 - 1216
  • [16] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
    Lalic, Nebojsa
    Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
    Culic, Marina
    Tikkanen, Christian Klyver
    Chubb, Barrie
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (03) : 1201 - 1216
  • [17] Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Switching to Insulin Degludec in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Basal-Bolus Therapy
    Langer, Jakob
    Wolden, Michael L.
    Shimoda, Seiya
    Sato, Miki
    Araki, Eiichi
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (04) : 1347 - 1356
  • [18] Efficacy of Insulin Degludec as Basal-Bolus Therapy After Switching from Insulin Glargine or Insulin Detemir in Young Persons with Type 1 Diabetes
    Urakami, Tatsuhiko
    Habu, Masako
    Okuno, Misako
    Suzuki, Junichi
    Takahashi, Shori
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A323 - A323
  • [19] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine and Insulin Detemir in the Basal Regimen for Naive Insulin Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Malaysia
    Shafie, Asrul Akmal
    Ng, Chin Hui
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 333 - 343
  • [20] An economic assessment of analogue basal-bolus insulin versus human basal-bolus insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes in the UK
    Palmer, Andrew J.
    Valentine, William J.
    Ray, Joshua A.
    Foos, Volker
    Lurati, Francesco
    Smith, Inger
    Lammert, Morten
    Roze, Stephane
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (04) : 895 - 901