Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK

被引:36
|
作者
Evans, M. [1 ]
Wolden, M. [2 ]
Gundgaard, J. [2 ]
Chubb, B. [3 ]
Christensen, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Llandough, Cardiff CF64 2XX, S Glam, Wales
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, W Sussex, England
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Insulin analogs; Insulin therapy; Nocturnal hypoglycemia; Pharmaco-economics; Type; 1; diabetes;
D O I
10.3111/13696998.2014.971160
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) vs insulin glargine (IGlar) as part of a basal-bolus treatment regimen in adults with T1DM, using a short-term economic model. Methods: Data from two phase III clinical studies were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term model. The costs and effects of treatment with IDeg vs IGlar were calculated over a 12-month period. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the results. The main outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option vs IGlar in patients with T1DM on a basal-bolus regimen. The base case ICER was estimated at 16,895 pound/QALY, which is below commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness in the UK. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was stable to variations in the majority of input parameters. The parameters that exerted the most influence on the ICER were hypoglycemia event rates, daily insulin dose, and disutility associated with non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events. However, even under extreme assumptions in the majority of analyses the ICERs remained below the commonly accepted threshold of 20,000- pound 30,000 pound per QALY gained. Conclusions: This short-term modeling approach accommodates the treat-to-target trial design required by regulatory bodies, and focuses on the impact of important aspects of insulin therapy such as hypoglycemia and dosing. For patients with T1DM who are treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option compared with IGlar. IDeg may be particularly cost-effective for sub-groups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent nocturnal hypoglycemia and those with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC/INSULIN ASPART TWICE DAILY VERSUS BASAL-BOLUS FULL REGIMEN IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN ALGERIA
    Sellam, Y.
    Malek, R.
    Semrouni, M.
    Belhadj, M.
    Zekri, S.
    Brouri, M.
    Arbouche, Z.
    Nouri, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S511 - S511
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin - from the UK health care cost perspective
    Evans, M.
    Wolden, M.
    Gundgaard, J.
    Chubb, B.
    Christensen, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2014, 16 (04): : 366 - 375
  • [3] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC COMPARED WITH INSULIN GLARGINE FOR PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INITIATING INSULIN THERAPY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Evans, M.
    Chubb, B.
    Christensen, T.
    Gundgaard, J.
    Wolden, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A442 - A442
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Marc Evans
    Barrie Chubb
    Jens Gundgaard
    Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 275 - 291
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Evans, Marc
    Chubb, Barrie
    Gundgaard, Jens
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2017, 8 (02) : 275 - 291
  • [6] LOWER TREATMENT COSTS WITH INSULIN GLARGINE COMPARED TO INSULIN DETEMIR IN TYPE 1 DIABETES PATIENTS TREATED WITH A BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN IN GERMANY
    Wiesner, T.
    Schaedlich, P. K.
    Dippel, F. W.
    Koltermann, K.
    Hagenmeyer, E. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A294 - A294
  • [7] Italian experience trial for the implementation of insulin glargine in basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes
    Brunetti, P.
    Muggeo, M.
    Cattin, L.
    Arcangeli, A.
    Pozzilli, P.
    Provenzano, V.
    Francesconi, A.
    Calatola, P.
    Santeusanio, F.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 : S394 - S394
  • [8] LONG-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DETEMIR COMPARED TO NEUTRAL PROTAMINE HAGEDORN INSULIN IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES USING A BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN IN SWEDEN
    Valentine, W. J.
    Lammert, M.
    Aagren, M.
    Gschwend, M. H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A503 - A503
  • [9] Interest Degludec insulin, a new ultra-long analogue insulin in basal-bolus in diabete Type 1: compared with insulin Glargine
    Charpentier, G.
    Fontaine, P.
    Meneghini, L.
    Home, P.
    Wendisch, U.
    Ratner, R.
    Endahl, L.
    Johansen, T.
    Lyby, K.
    Jendle, J.
    Roberts, A.
    Devries, J. H.
    Birkeland, K.
    Cariou, Bertrand
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2011, 37 : A35 - A35
  • [10] Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in Sweden
    Valentine, William J.
    Aagren, Mark
    Haglund, Mattias
    Ericsson, Asa
    Gschwend, Manuela H.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (01) : 79 - 87