Judicial Doctrine of Courts of Latin America about the Quid Pro Quo Principle as the Basis and Limit of the Jurisdiction Immunities of the International Organizations

被引:0
作者
Masbernat, Patricio [1 ]
Ramos-Fuentes, Gloria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Chile, Providencia, Chile
[2] Gobierno Chile, Minist Relac Exteriores, Santiago, Chile
关键词
International Organizations; Immunities from Jurisdiction; Quid Pro Quo Principle; Conflict Resolution; Responsibility of International Organizations;
D O I
10.22187/rfd2021n50a17
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to address an aspect within the specific field of the legal regime that disciplines the immunities of jurisdiction of international organizations, which is different from others such as those of the immunities of States and diplomatic agents. The majority theories in this matter are absolute, relative and functional. Currently, some very prominent authors have defended another, which we could call "quid pro quo", and which has been expressed by some national and international courts. This work, in addition to synthesizing very briefly the doctrinal position, seeks to expose the main judicial decisions that have defended this theory in Latin America
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Acordao Inteiro Teor N., 2012, AC INT TEOR RR830002 AC INT TEOR RR830002
[2]  
Acordao Inteiro Teor N., AC INT TEOR RR271003 AC INT TEOR RR271003
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ARGENTINA CORTE SUPR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ARGENTINA CORTE SUPR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRIB SUP TRAB RR5742 TRIB SUP TRAB RR5742
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CONSEJO ESTADO SALA CONSEJO ESTADO SALA
[7]  
Araujo F., 2016, REV DIREITO INT, V13, P391
[8]  
Argentina Argentina, 2003, CORT SUPR JUST NAC S CORT SUPR JUST NAC S
[9]  
Argentina Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion, 1998, CAS MAR SCA EMPR NAV CAS MAR SCA EMPR NAV
[10]  
Azaria D., 2015, M PLANCK ENCY PUBLIC