Patient and Physician Perspectives on Public Reporting of Mortality Ratings for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State

被引:23
作者
Fernandez, Genaro [1 ]
Narins, Craig R. [1 ]
Bruckel, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ayers, Brian [2 ]
Ling, Frederick S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
ethics and policy; mortality/survival; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality and outcomes; statements and guidelines; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; MANAGEMENT; RATES; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003511
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Public reporting of physician-specific outcome data for procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), can influence physicians to avoid high-risk patients who may benefit from treatment. Prior physician attitudes toward public scorecards in New York State (NYS) have been studied, but the exclusion criteria have evolved. Additionally, patient perceptions toward such reports remain poorly understood. This study evaluates (1) whether exclusion of certain high-risk patients from public reporting of PCI outcomes in NYS has influenced physician attitudes, (2) current patient awareness and use of publicly reported outcome data, and (3) differences in physician and patient attitudes toward public reporting. Methods and Results-A questionnaire was administered to interventional cardiologists in NYS with specific emphasis on how modifications in publicly reported outcome data have influenced their practice. The results were compared with a 2003 survey administered by our group. A separate questionnaire regarding the publicly available NYS PCI Report was administered to patients referred to our center for possible PCI. The majority of interventional cardiologists indicated that the exclusion of patients with anoxic brain injury and refractory cardiogenic shock from public reporting has made them more likely to perform PCI for these subgroups. While patient awareness of the NYS PCI Report was low, patients were significantly more likely than physicians to think that publication of physician-specific mortality data can provide an accurate measure of physician quality, serve to improve patient care, and provide useful information in terms of physician selection. Conclusions-The study provides further evidence that public reporting of physician-specific outcome data influences physician behavior and indicates that significant discrepancies exist in how scorecards are perceived by physicians versus patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   State Mandated Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes is Associated with Better Outcomes: A report from the NCDR® [J].
Cavender, Matthew A. ;
Joynt, Karen E. ;
Resnic, Frederick S. ;
Parzynski, Craig S. ;
Rumsfeld, John S. ;
Moscucci, Mauro ;
Masoudi, Frederick A. ;
Curtis, Jeptha P. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Gurm, Hitinder S. .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
[22]   Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Apolito, Renato A. ;
Greenberg, Mark A. ;
Menegus, Mark A. ;
Lowe, April M. ;
Sleeper, Lynn A. ;
Goldberger, Mark H. ;
Remick, Joshua ;
Radford, Martha J. ;
Hochman, Judith S. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 155 (02) :267-273
[23]   Relationship between operator and hospital volumes and short-term mortality for percutaneous coronary intervention in New York [J].
Qian, Feng ;
Zhong, Ye ;
Hannan, Edward L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 293 :91-100
[24]   A Simple Prognostic Classification Model for Postprocedural Complications After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction (from the New York State Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Database) [J].
Negassa, Abdissa ;
Monrad, E. Scott ;
Sninivas, Vankeepuram S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 103 (07) :937-942
[25]   Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program [J].
Beatty, Alexis L. ;
Doll, Jacob A. ;
Schopfer, David W. ;
Maynard, Charles ;
Plomondon, Mary E. ;
Shen, Hui ;
Whooley, Mary A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (19)
[26]   The Impact of Public Performance Reporting on Market Share, Mortality, and Patient Mix Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (2000-2016): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Dunt, David ;
Prang, Khic-Houy ;
Sabanovic, Hana ;
Kelaher, Margaret .
MEDICAL CARE, 2018, 56 (11) :956-966
[27]   Response to a Differing Perspective The Real Issues Related to Public Reporting Around Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J].
Berger, Peter B. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (05) :513-515
[28]   High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Public Reporting States: the Evidence, Exclusion of Critically Ill Patients, and Implications [J].
Wadhera R.K. ;
Anderson J.D. ;
Yeh R.W. .
Current Heart Failure Reports, 2017, 14 (6) :514-518
[29]   New York Risk Model and Simplified Risk Score for In-Hospital/30-Day Mortality for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J].
Hannan, Edward L. ;
Zhong, Ye ;
Cozzens, Kimberly ;
Ling, Frederick S. K. ;
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
King III, Spencer B. ;
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline ;
Venditti, Ferdinand J. ;
Berger, Peter B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 206 :23-30
[30]   Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Patient Risk A New Radial Paradox? [J].
Watson, Ryan A. ;
Kochar, Ajar ;
Shah, Pinak B. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (07)