Patient and Physician Perspectives on Public Reporting of Mortality Ratings for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State

被引:23
|
作者
Fernandez, Genaro [1 ]
Narins, Craig R. [1 ]
Bruckel, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ayers, Brian [2 ]
Ling, Frederick S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2017年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
ethics and policy; mortality/survival; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality and outcomes; statements and guidelines; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; MANAGEMENT; RATES; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003511
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Public reporting of physician-specific outcome data for procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), can influence physicians to avoid high-risk patients who may benefit from treatment. Prior physician attitudes toward public scorecards in New York State (NYS) have been studied, but the exclusion criteria have evolved. Additionally, patient perceptions toward such reports remain poorly understood. This study evaluates (1) whether exclusion of certain high-risk patients from public reporting of PCI outcomes in NYS has influenced physician attitudes, (2) current patient awareness and use of publicly reported outcome data, and (3) differences in physician and patient attitudes toward public reporting. Methods and Results-A questionnaire was administered to interventional cardiologists in NYS with specific emphasis on how modifications in publicly reported outcome data have influenced their practice. The results were compared with a 2003 survey administered by our group. A separate questionnaire regarding the publicly available NYS PCI Report was administered to patients referred to our center for possible PCI. The majority of interventional cardiologists indicated that the exclusion of patients with anoxic brain injury and refractory cardiogenic shock from public reporting has made them more likely to perform PCI for these subgroups. While patient awareness of the NYS PCI Report was low, patients were significantly more likely than physicians to think that publication of physician-specific mortality data can provide an accurate measure of physician quality, serve to improve patient care, and provide useful information in terms of physician selection. Conclusions-The study provides further evidence that public reporting of physician-specific outcome data influences physician behavior and indicates that significant discrepancies exist in how scorecards are perceived by physicians versus patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mortality in New York State Are We Helping Our Patients?
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2017, 10 (09):
  • [2] Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan
    Boyden, Thomas F.
    Joynt, Karen E.
    McCoy, Lisa
    Neely, Megan L.
    Cavender, Matthew A.
    Dixon, Simon
    Masoudi, Frederick A.
    Peterson, Eric
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (06) : 1227 - 1233
  • [3] Public Reporting on Risk-Adjusted Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in New York State Forecasting Ability and Impact on Market Share and Physicians' Decisions to Discontinue Practice
    Chen, Lena M.
    Orav, E. John
    Epstein, Arnold M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (01): : 70 - 75
  • [4] Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Institutional Costs and Physician Burden
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    O'Brien, Colin W.
    Maddox, Karen E. Joynt
    Ho, Kalon K. L.
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Shah, Pinak B.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (20) : 2604 - 2608
  • [5] Taking the "Public" Out of Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (15): : 1439 - 1440
  • [7] Impact of COVID-19 on percutaneous coronary intervention utilization and mortality in New York
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Zhong, Ye
    Cozzens, Kimberly
    Osinaga, Alda
    Efferen, Linda
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Ling, Frederick S. K.
    Gary, Walford
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Berger, Peter B.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline
    King, Spencer B., III
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 101 (06) : 980 - 994
  • [8] Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Moving Beyond the Status Quo
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    Maddox, Karen E. Joynt
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 3 (07) : 635 - 640
  • [9] Response to Outlier Status Lessons From Public Reporting for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Joynt, Karen E.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (20) : 1908 - 1910
  • [10] The Impact of Extreme-Risk Cases on Hospitals' Risk-Adjusted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mortality Ratings
    Sherwood, Matthew W.
    Brennan, J. Matthew
    Ho, Kalon K.
    Masoudi, Frederick A.
    Messenger, John C.
    Weaver, Douglas
    Dai, David
    Peterson, Eric D.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (01) : 10 - 16