Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer

被引:186
作者
Kwa, Maryann [1 ]
Makris, Andreas [2 ]
Esteva, Francisco J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Div Hematol Oncol, Perlmutter Canc Ctr, Langone Med Ctr, 160 East 34th St, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Breast Canc Res Unit, Rickmansworth Rd, Northwood HA6 2RN, Middx, England
关键词
21-GENE RECURRENCE SCORE; 70-GENE PROGNOSIS-SIGNATURE; MOLECULAR GRADE INDEX; TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; DISTANT RECURRENCE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; POSTMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.74
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with different subtypes having a distinct biological, molecular, and clinical course. Assessments of standard clinical and pathological features have traditionally been used to determine the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early stage breast cancer; however, the ability to identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy remains a challenge, leading to the overtreatment of some patients. Advances in molecular medicine have substantially improved the accuracy of gene-expression profiling of breast tumours, resulting in improvements in the ability to predict a patient's risk of breast cancer recurrence and likely response to endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy. These genomic assays, several of which are commercially available, have aided physicians in tailoring treatment decisions for patients at the individual level. Herein, we describe the available data on the clinical validity of the most widely available assays in patients with early stage breast cancer, with a focus on the development, validation, and clinical application of these assays, in addition to the anticipated outcomes of ongoing prospective trials. We also review data from comparative studies of these assays and from cost-effectiveness analyses relating to their clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 610
页数:16
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials [J].
Albain, K. ;
Anderson, S. ;
Arriagada, R. ;
Barlow, W. ;
Bergh, J. ;
Bliss, J. ;
Buyse, M. ;
Cameron, D. ;
Carrasco, E. ;
Clarke, M. ;
Correa, C. ;
Coates, A. ;
Collins, R. ;
Costantino, J. ;
Cutter, D. ;
Cuzick, J. ;
Darby, S. ;
Davidson, N. ;
Davies, C. ;
Davies, K. ;
Delmestri, A. ;
Di Leo, A. ;
Dowsett, M. ;
Elphinstone, P. ;
Evans, V. ;
Ewertz, M. ;
Gelber, R. ;
Gettins, L. ;
Geyer, C. ;
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Godwin, J. ;
Gray, R. ;
Gregory, C. ;
Hayes, D. ;
Hill, C. ;
Ingle, J. ;
Jakesz, R. ;
James, S. ;
Kaufmann, M. ;
Kerr, A. ;
MacKinnon, E. ;
McGale, P. ;
McHugh, T. ;
Norton, L. ;
Ohashi, Y. ;
Paik, S. ;
Pan, H. C. ;
Perez, E. ;
Peto, R. ;
Piccart, M. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814) :432-444
[2]   Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Ravdin, Peter M. ;
Farrar, William B. ;
Burton, Gary V. ;
Ketchel, Steven J. ;
Cobau, Charles D. ;
Levine, Ellis G. ;
Ingle, James N. ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Lichter, Allen S. ;
Schneider, Daniel J. ;
Abeloff, Martin D. ;
Henderson, I. Craig ;
Muss, Hyman B. ;
Green, Stephanie J. ;
Lew, Danika ;
Livingston, Robert B. ;
Martino, Silvana ;
Osborne, C. Kent .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9707) :2055-2063
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROG P AM SOC CLIN O
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NCCN Clin Pract Guidel Oncol
[5]  
[Anonymous], ADJ SYST THER VOOR H
[6]  
[Anonymous], PROG P AM SOC CLIN O
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016 SAN ANT BREAST
[8]   Utility of prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer practice: The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Consensus Statement [J].
Azim, H. A., Jr. ;
Michiels, S. ;
Zagouri, F. ;
Delaloge, S. ;
Filipits, M. ;
Namer, M. ;
Neven, P. ;
Symmans, W. F. ;
Thompson, A. ;
Andre, F. ;
Loi, S. ;
Swanton, C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (03) :647-654
[9]   Comparing Breast Cancer Multiparameter Tests in the OPTIMA Prelim Trial: No Test Is More Equal Than the Others [J].
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Bayani, Jane ;
Marshall, Andrea ;
Dunn, Janet A. ;
Campbell, Amy ;
Cunningham, Carrie ;
Sobol, Monika S. ;
Hall, Peter S. ;
Poole, Christopher J. ;
Cameron, David A. ;
Earl, Helena M. ;
Rea, Daniel W. ;
Macpherson, Iain R. ;
Canney, Peter ;
Francis, Adele ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Hughes-Davies, Luke ;
Makris, Andreas ;
Stein, Robert C. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (09)
[10]   Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests [J].
Botkin, Jeffrey R. ;
Teutsch, Steven M. ;
Kaye, Celia I. ;
Hayes, Maxine ;
Haddow, James E. ;
Bradley, Linda A. ;
Szegda, Kathleen ;
Dotson, W. David .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (04) :228-235