Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: Application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia

被引:50
作者
Allarakhia, Minna [1 ]
Walsh, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Management Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ New Mexico, Anderson Sch Management, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Nanotechnology; Consortium; Technology entrepreneurship; Institutional analysis development; Technological convergence; Knowledge management; Intellectual property; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION NETWORKS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY; IMPACT; OPPORTUNITIES; COOPERATION; PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Governments and companies around the globe have embraced nanotechnology as a strategically critical pan industrial technology. Many view it as one of the essential foundation technology bases of the next Schumpeterian wave. A number of commercial and government sponsored groups have developed a variety of consortia centered on the commercial promise of nanotechnology. Yet the optimal management of these consortia has proven elusive to the point that some suggest that they cannot be managed at all. If these consortia are important, and their effective management crucial, then there is cause for concern. We utilize the case study method to create a nanotechnology consortia management diagnostic model based on institutional analysis development (IAD). Nanotechnology consortia are formed for a variety of purposes and their stakeholders include governments, industries, large firms, SME, entrepreneurial enterprises, and supporting firms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[41]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[42]   Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies [J].
Corley, Elizabeth A. ;
Boardman, P. Craig ;
Bozeman, Barry .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (07) :975-993
[43]  
D'Silva Joel, 2009, EUROPEAN INTELLECTUA, V31, P300
[44]   A resource-based theory of strategic alliances [J].
Das, TK ;
Teng, BS .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (01) :31-61
[45]  
Drexler E.D., 2004, Bulletin of Science, V24, P21, DOI DOI 10.1177/0270467604263113
[46]  
Drexler K.E., 1986, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology
[47]   Introduction to the section "Nanotechnology Policy" [J].
Eijkel, Kees ;
Groen, A. J. ;
Walsh, Steven .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (09) :1631-1633
[48]   Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ;
Graebner, Melissa E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (01) :25-32
[49]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[50]   The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations [J].
Etzkowitz, H ;
Leydesdorff, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) :109-123