Differential effects of voluntary environmental programs and mandatory regulations on corporate green innovation

被引:36
作者
Li, Dayuan [1 ]
Tang, Fei [1 ]
Zhang, Lu [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan First Normal Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Voluntary environmental programs; Mandatory environmental regulations; Organizational slack; Corporate green innovation; SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; SELF-REGULATION; ISO; 14001; ECO-INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL SLACK; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; PRODUCT INNOVATIONS; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; MODERATING ROLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-020-04137-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
There is a long-lasting debate on whether environmental regulation fosters or hinders corporate green innovation. To address this debate, this study differentiates two types of regulations: mandatory environmental regulations (MERs) and voluntary environmental programs (VEPs), and explores whether MERs and VEPs, separately and jointly, affects corporate green innovation. This study also investigates the moderating effect of organizational slack on the focal relationship. With the data of top 100 listed companies in China, the results show that MERs significantly negatively affect green innovation, while VEPs significantly positively influence green innovation, and VEPs mitigate the negative impact of MERs on green innovation. Moreover, organizational slack strengthens the positive relationship between VEPs and green innovation, while no significant moderating effect on the MER-green innovation relationship. These findings provide guidance for corporate green innovation under mandatory regulations and voluntary programs.
引用
收藏
页码:3437 / 3456
页数:20
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]   Adjusting the measurement of US manufacturing productivity for air pollution emissions control [J].
Aiken, DV ;
Pasurka, CA .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (04) :329-351
[2]   Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality [J].
Alberini, A ;
Segerson, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 22 (1-2) :157-184
[3]   Cleaner energy planning, managethent and technologies: Perspectives of supply-demand side and end-of-pipe management [J].
Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan ;
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir ;
Varbanov, Petar Sabev .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 136 :1-13
[4]  
Ambec I., 2006, Energy Studies Review, V14, P42, DOI [10.15173/esr.v14i2.493, DOI 10.15173/ESR.V14I2.493]
[5]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[6]   Big Egos Can Be Green: A Study of CEO Hubris and Environmental Innovation [J].
Arena, Claudia ;
Michelon, Giovanna ;
Trojanowski, Grzegorz .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (02) :316-336
[7]   The Diffusion of Voluntary Environmental Programs: The Case of ISO 14001 in Korea, 1996-2011 [J].
Baek, Kyungmin .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 145 (02) :325-336
[8]   How environmental protection agencies can promote eco-innovation: The prospect of voluntary reciprocal legitimacy [J].
Ball, Chris ;
Burt, George ;
De Vries, Frans ;
MacEachern, Erik .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 :242-253
[9]   Underlying mechanisms in the maintenance of ISO 14001 environmental management system [J].
Balzarova, Michaela A. ;
Castka, Pavel .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (18) :1949-1957
[10]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218