A Community Study of SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT-PCR in Saliva: A Reliable and Effective Method

被引:7
|
作者
Fronza, Filippo [1 ]
Groff, Nelli [1 ]
Martinelli, Angela [1 ]
Passerini, Beatrice Zita [1 ]
Rensi, Nicolo [1 ]
Cortelletti, Irene [1 ]
Vivori, Nicolo [1 ]
Adami, Valentina [1 ]
Helander, Anna [1 ]
Bridi, Simone [1 ]
Pancher, Michael [1 ]
Greco, Valentina [1 ]
Garritano, Sonia Iolanda [1 ]
Piffer, Elena [1 ]
Stefani, Lara [1 ]
De Sanctis, Veronica [1 ]
Bertorelli, Roberto [1 ]
Pancheri, Serena [2 ]
Collini, Lucia [2 ]
Dassi, Erik [1 ]
Quattrone, Alessandro [1 ]
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria [3 ]
Icardi, Giancarlo [4 ]
Poli, Guido [5 ]
Caciagli, Patrizio [1 ,2 ]
Ferro, Antonio [2 ]
Pizzato, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Dept Cellular Computat & Integrat Biol, I-38123 Trento, Italy
[2] Azienda Provinciale & Servizi Sanitari, I-38123 Trento, Italy
[3] Natl Inst Infect Dis L Spallanzani, I-00149 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, I-20132 Milan, Italy
来源
VIRUSES-BASEL | 2022年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
COVID-19; saliva testing; molecular diagnosis; SARS-CoV-2; detection; RNA;
D O I
10.3390/v14020313
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Efficient, wide-scale testing for SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for monitoring the incidence of the infection in the community. The gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis is the molecular analysis of epithelial secretions from the upper respiratory system captured by nasopharyngeal (NP) or oropharyngeal swabs. Given the ease of collection, saliva has been proposed as a possible substitute to support testing at the population level. Here, we used a novel saliva collection device designed to favour the safe and correct acquisition of the sample, as well as the processivity of the downstream molecular analysis. We tested 1003 nasopharyngeal swabs and paired saliva samples self-collected by individuals recruited at a public drive-through testing facility. An overall moderate concordance (68%) between the two tests was found, with evidence that neither system can diagnose the infection in 100% of the cases. While the two methods performed equally well in symptomatic individuals, their discordance was mainly restricted to samples from convalescent subjects. The saliva test was at least as effective as NP swabs in asymptomatic individuals recruited for contact tracing. Our study describes a testing strategy of self-collected saliva samples, which is reliable for wide-scale COVID-19 screening in the community and is particularly effective for contact tracing.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Saliva-based PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Takeuchi, Yoshimasa
    Furuchi, Mika
    Kamimoto, Atsushi
    Honda, Kazuya
    Matsumura, Hideo
    Kobayashi, Ryutaro
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 62 (03) : 350 - 351
  • [42] Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature
    Torretta, Sara
    Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo
    Cristofaro, Valentina
    Ettori, Jacopo
    Solimeno, Lorenzo
    Battilocchi, Ludovica
    D'Onghia, Alessandra
    Bonsembiante, Anna
    Pignataro, Lorenzo
    Marchisio, Paola
    Capaccio, Pasquale
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2021, 100 (2_SUPPL) : 131S - 138S
  • [43] Multicenter comparison of the Cobas 6800 system with the RealStar RT-PCR kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Wirden, Marc
    Feghoul, Linda
    Bertine, Melanie
    Nere, Marie-Laure
    Le Hingrat, Quentin
    Abdi, Basma
    Boutolleau, David
    Ferre, Valentine Marie
    Jary, Aude
    Delaugerre, Constance
    Marcelin, Anne-Genevieve
    Descamps, Diane
    Legoff, Jerome
    Visseaux, Benoit
    Chaix, Marie-Laure
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 130
  • [44] Evaluation of a real-time RT-PCR panel for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bat guano
    Anis, Eman
    Turner, Greg
    Ellis, Julie C.
    Di Salvo, Andrew
    Barnard, Amanda
    Carroll, Susan
    Murphy, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2021, 33 (02) : 331 - 335
  • [45] Viral culture and immunofluorescence for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in RT-PCR positive respiratory samples
    Berengua, Carla
    Lopez, Marina
    Esteban, Montserrat
    Marin, Pilar
    Ramos, Paula
    del Cuerpo, Margarita
    Gich, Ignasi
    Navarro, Ferran
    Miro, Elisenda
    Rabella, Nuria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 152
  • [46] Usefulness of real-time RT-PCR to understand the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 in blood: A prospective study
    Zurita-Cruz, Nelly Daniela
    Martin-Ramirez, Alexandra
    Rodriguez-Serrano, Diego Anibal
    Gonzalez-Alvaro, Isidoro
    Roy-Vallejo, Emilia
    De la Camara, Rafael
    Garcia-Rodrigo, Leticia Fontan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 152
  • [47] Development of a rapid viability RT-PCR (RV-RT-PCR) method to detect infectious SARS-CoV-2 from swabs
    Shah, Sanjiv R.
    Kane, Staci R.
    Elsheikh, Maher
    Alfaro, Teneile M.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 297
  • [48] Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Renzoni, Adriana
    Perez, Francisco
    Ngo Nsoga, Marie Therese
    Yerly, Sabine
    Boehm, Erik
    Gayet-Ageron, Angele
    Kaiser, Laurent
    Schibler, Manuel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [49] Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of nine commercial RT-PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Colombia
    Hernandez, Carolina
    Florez, Carolina
    Castaneda, Sergio
    Ballesteros, Nathalia
    Martinez, David
    Castillo, Adriana
    Munoz, Marina
    Gomez, Sergio
    Rico, Angelica
    Pardo, Liseth
    Paniz-Mondolfi, Alberto
    Ramirez, Juan David
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (09) : 5618 - 5622
  • [50] Large-scale implementation of pooled RNA extraction and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Ben-Ami, R.
    Klochendler, A.
    Seidel, M.
    Sido, T.
    Gurel-Gurevich, O.
    Yassour, M.
    Meshorer, E.
    Benedek, G.
    Fogel, I.
    Oiknine-Djian, E.
    Gertler, A.
    Rotstein, Z.
    Lavi, B.
    Dor, Y.
    Wolf, D. G.
    Salton, M.
    Drier, Y.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (09) : 1248 - 1253