Capitalising teamwork for enhancing project delivery and management in construction: empirical study in Malaysia

被引:29
作者
Yap, Jeffs Ey Boon Hui [1 ]
Leong, Wen Jie [1 ]
Skitmore, Martin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UTAR, Lee Kong Chian Fac Engn & Sci, Dept Surveying, Kajang, Malaysia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Res Inst Complex Engn & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Construction; Teamwork; Team effectiveness; Dimensions; Temporary project team; Project management; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; DELAYS; MODEL; COLLABORATION; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-10-2019-0581
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose Teamwork in the construction industry has attracted much attention from both academic and industrial circles. Most importantly, improving team effectiveness will increase the likelihood of successful project delivery. Recognising the factors influencing team dynamics is important for enhanced team performance. Design/methodology/approach Based on a detailed literature review, a survey questionnaire containing 10 aspects and 25 attributes of teamwork relevant to construction is used to collect feedback from Malaysian construction practitioners from client, consultant and contractor organisations to prioritise these hypothesised variables. The data are then subjected to reliability analysis, descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and frequencies), a one-sample t-test, the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and exploratory factor analysis. Findings The significance of these aspects and attributes is then presented. The three most crucial aspects are "project performance", "decision-making capability" and "problem-solving ability". The most influential attributes are "effective communication between project team members", "efficient team leadership", "well-defined team responsibilities and roles", "clear team goals and objectives" and "good collaboration between all project leaders". The Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA reveals five attributes having statistically significant differences with respect to company size, namely "clear team goals and objectives", "commitment to the project", "adequate resources", "team or task processes" and "creativity and innovation". Six underlying dimensions are found, comprising (1) participative engagement and task commitment; (2) team responsibility structure and accountability; (3) culture of trust and respect; (4) leader's skills and abilities; (5) top management support; and (6) synergic working environment. Practical implications - The identification of these dimensions for team effectiveness provides rigorous basis for formulating useful team-building strategies for integrating a collaborative environment among project stakeholders and consequently improving project performance. Originality/value This paper bridges the identified knowledge gap concerning the dimensionality of teamwork attributes in construction-based setting and adds to existing knowledge of how team effectiveness can be leveraged to improve project performance in the construction management literature.
引用
收藏
页码:1479 / 1503
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Study of dependencies in a risk management process: case of a construction project [J].
Lmoussaoui, Hafida ;
Jamouli, Hicham .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (GOL 2014), 2014, :112-117
[42]   Study on tacit knowledge flowing and converting in construction project management [J].
Zhang, QP ;
Shan, W .
Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, :816-819
[43]   A Study of the Functional Mechanism of Petrochemical Engineering Construction Project Management [J].
Wang, Ji-ming .
FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 1 (02) :129-139
[44]   Study on the Construction of Information System for Project Management in Comprehensive Games [J].
Zhao, Lu-nan .
ICIC 2009: SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCE, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :212-215
[45]   Educational Prediction Markets: Construction Project Management Case Study [J].
Damnjanovic, Ivan ;
Faghihi, Vahid ;
Scott, Chyllis ;
McTigue, Erin ;
Reinschmidt, Kenneth .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2013, 139 (02) :134-138
[46]   Study on Comprehensive Evaluation of Construction Project Management Dynamic Effect [J].
Huang, Guilin ;
Zhou, Shuhui .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, :593-596
[47]   Study on the construction project management system - Application service provider [J].
Jin Changhong ;
Li Qiming .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2007, :733-738
[48]   Innovative project delivery methods through public-private-partnership - a case study on Malaysia's SMART project [J].
Chang, LH ;
Er, SC ;
Khairuddin, AR .
Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, :444-449
[49]   An empirical study of long-term personal project information management [J].
Pucihar, Klen Copic ;
Kljun, Matjaz ;
Mariani, John ;
Dix, Alan John .
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 68 (04) :495-522
[50]   Does a Project Manager Assignment Process Affect Project Management Performance Indicators? An Empirical Study [J].
Seboni, Lone ;
Ssegawa, Joseph .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)