INTENSITY-INVARIANT TEXTURE ANALYSIS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF BI-RADS CATEGORY 3 BREAST MASSES

被引:27
作者
Lo, Chung-Ming [1 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [2 ]
Huang, Chiun-Sheng [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jeon-Hor [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Yang, Min-Chun [1 ]
Chang, Ruey-Feng [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Funct Oncoimaging, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[7] E Da Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[8] I Shou Univ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[9] Natl Taiwan Univ, Grad Inst Biomed Elect & Bioinformat, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Breast cancer; Ultrasound; Breast imaging and reporting data system; Computer-aided diagnosis; Ranklet; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; PROBABLY BENIGN; ULTRASOUND; MAMMOGRAPHY; FEATURES; SCHEME; US; VARIABILITY; SONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.003
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Radiologists likely incorrectly classify benign masses as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was developed in this study as a second viewer to avoid misclassification of carcinomas. Sixty-nine biopsy-proven BI-RADS category 3 masses, including 21 malignant and 48 benign masses, were used to evaluate the CAD system. To improve the texture features, gray-scale variations between images were reduced by transforming pixels into intensity-invariant ranklet coefficients. The textures of the tumor and speckle pixels were extracted from the transformed ranklet images to provide more robust features than in conventional CAD systems. As a result, tumor texture and speckle texture with ranklet transformation achieved significantly better areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) compared with those without ranklet transformation (Az = 0.83 vs. 0.58 and Az = 0.80 vs. 0.56, p value < 0.05). The improved CAD system can be a second reader to confirm the classification of BI-RADS category 3 masses. (C) 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2048
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, Digital Image Processing
  • [2] Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts
    Berg, WA
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (05) : 845 - +
  • [3] Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Blume, Jeffrey D.
    Cormack, Jean B.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    Lehrer, Daniel
    Bohm-Velez, Marcela
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Jong, Roberta A.
    Evans, W. Phil
    Morton, Marilyn J.
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    Larsen, Linda Hovanessian
    Barr, Richard G.
    Farria, Dione M.
    Marques, Helga S.
    Boparai, Karan
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18): : 2151 - 2163
  • [4] Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors
    Chang, RF
    Wu, WJ
    Moon, WK
    Chen, DR
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 89 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [5] Chang RF, 2008, ARTECH HSE BIOINF BI, P165
  • [6] FAST ALGORITHMS FOR LOW-LEVEL VISION
    DERICHE, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 12 (01) : 78 - 87
  • [7] Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms
    Drukker, K
    Giger, ML
    Metz, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) : 834 - 840
  • [8] Field A., 2018, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, V6a, DOI DOI 10.1234/12345678
  • [9] Probably benign breast masses at US: Is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?
    Graf, Oswald
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Hopf, Gottfried
    Graf, Claudia
    Sickles, Edward A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [10] Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3)
    Gruber, R.
    Jaromi, S.
    Rudas, M.
    Pfarl, G.
    Riedl, C. C.
    Floery, D.
    Graf, O.
    Sickles, E. A.
    Helbich, T. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (03) : 398 - 403