For more than two decades, participatory mechanisms have often been invoked as quasi-policy instruments to counterbalance a deficit of legitimacy surrounding political representation. Scientific literature has widely investigated this process. Empirical studies have documented it. However, a blind spot remains. How does this process influence the role of citizens when they are called to sanction political decisions concerning risks, decisions to which they have been at least partly associated? This paper innovatively combines theories of democracy and sequential policy analysis to investigate the articulation of participation and representation when risk issues are regulated. This paper's theoretical reflection is documented through the example of GMO policy in Europe and, more specifically, in Belgium.
机构:
ActionAid Denmark, MS Training Ctr Dev Cooperat, POB 254, Arusha, TanzaniaActionAid Denmark, MS Training Ctr Dev Cooperat, POB 254, Arusha, Tanzania
Mercy, Nkatha
GATEWAYS-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY RESEARCH AND ENGAGEMENT,
2020,
13
(01):
机构:
Seoul Inst, Dept Civil Econ Res, Seoul, South Korea
Evaluat Inst Reg Publ Corp, Dept Res & Performance Evaluat, Seoul, South KoreaSeoul Inst, Dept Civil Econ Res, Seoul, South Korea
Kim, Da Kyoung
Kim, Pan Suk
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Yonsei Univ, Coll Govt & Business, Publ Adm, Wonju Campus, Wonju, South KoreaSeoul Inst, Dept Civil Econ Res, Seoul, South Korea
Kim, Pan Suk
Oberg, PerOla
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, Polit Sci, Uppsala, SwedenSeoul Inst, Dept Civil Econ Res, Seoul, South Korea