During-incident process assessment in emergency management: Concept and strategy

被引:34
作者
Chen, An [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Ning [1 ]
Li, Jimei [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Super Engn Porto, GECAD, P-4200072 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Policy & Management, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ, Inst Emergency Management, Kaifeng 475004, Peoples R China
关键词
Emergency management; During-incident process assessment; Mitigability; Rescuability; Recoverability; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT MODEL; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FUZZY; ATTITUDES; RESILIENCE; EVOLUTION; DISASTER; SYSTEMS; HAZARDS; TSUNAMI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
An incident is normally composed of three stages: pre-incident, during-incident and post-incident. The assessment is a prominent composition in the lifecycle of emergency management for the purpose of quick and effective response. Present-day assessment methods mainly concern the pre-incident risk evaluation and the post-incident loss evaluation. However, during-incident process assessment is of crucial importance to assist the decision-making in emergency response and eventually achieve the goals of emergency management. This paper analyzes the influencing factors of during-incident process assessment and proposes a conceptual model of assessment. Three during-incident process assessment strategies, namely, "mitigability", "rescuability", and recoverability are illustrated which quantitatively characterize the evolution of incidents and corresponding responses, and hence contribute to appropriate decisions in practical applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 102
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 1730 I STUD LAB
[2]   Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events [J].
Antonioni, Giacomo ;
Bonvicini, Sarah ;
Spadoni, Gigliola ;
Cozzani, Valerio .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (09) :1442-1450
[3]   The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation [J].
Brooks, N ;
Adger, WN ;
Kelly, PM .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :151-163
[4]   Application of a quantitative risk assessment method to emergency response planning [J].
Brown, David F. ;
Dunn, William E. .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (05) :1243-1265
[5]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[6]  
Buckle P., 2001, ASSESSING RESILIENCE
[7]  
BURBY RJ, 1998, COOPERATING NATURE C, pCH5
[8]   Snow avalanche risk assessment and mapping: A new method based on a combination of statistical analysis, avalanche dynamics simulation and empirically-based vulnerability relations integrated in a GIS platform [J].
Cappabianca, F. ;
Barbolini, M. ;
Natale, L. .
COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 54 (03) :193-205
[9]  
Chen A, 2008, B CHINESE ACAD SCI, V23, P531
[10]  
Chen A., 2009, Modern emergency management theory and method