Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection

被引:96
作者
Buchner, Anna M. [1 ]
Shahid, Muhammad W. [1 ]
Heckman, Michael G. [2 ]
Diehl, Nancy N. [2 ]
McNeil, Rebecca B. [2 ]
Cleveland, Patrick [1 ]
Gill, Kanwar R. [1 ]
Schore, Anthony [1 ]
Ghabril, Marwan [1 ]
Raimondo, Massimo [1 ]
Gross, Seth A. [1 ]
Wallace, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Biostat Unit, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
TO-BACK COLONOSCOPIES; DETECTION RATES; MISS RATES; POLYPS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.060
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Previous studies examining the effect of fellow participation on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy have yielded conflicting results, and factors such as adenoma size and location have not been rigorously evaluated. Objective: To examine whether fellow participation during screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy affects overall, size-specific, or location-specific adenoma or polyp detection rate. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 2430 colonoscopies performed in our ambulatory surgical center between September 2006 and December 2007, comparing adenoma and polyp detection rates of colonoscopies performed by fellows with supervising staff endoscopists (n = 318) with colonoscopies performed by staff endoscopists without fellow participation (n = 2112). Study participants included patients who underwent screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies in our GI suite. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of fellow participation with adenoma and polyp detection. Results: There was evidence of a higher rate of small (<5 mm) adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present (25% vs 17%, P = .001). This remained significant after multiple-testing adjustment (P <= .003 considered significant). Findings were similar, although not significant for small polyps (36% vs 29%, P = .007). There was a trend toward increased adenoma detection in colonoscopies with a fellow present compared with those without (30% vs 26%, P = .11). Multivariable adjustment for potentially confounding variables did not alter these associations. Limitations: The study had a retrospective design, and information regarding bowel preparation was not available for 37% of patients. Conclusion: Fellow involvement was associated with increased detection rates of small adenomas, providing evidence that the presence of a fellow during colonoscopy plays a role in enhancing the effectiveness of the examination. (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1223-31.)
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1231
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment
  • [2] Effect of a Time-Dependent Colonoscopic Withdrawal Protocol on Adenoma Detection During Screening Colonoscopy
    Barclay, Robert L.
    Vicari, Joseph J.
    Greenlaw, Roger L.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (10) : 1091 - 1098
  • [3] Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas
    Butterly, LF
    Chase, MP
    Pohl, H
    Fiarman, GS
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (03) : 343 - 348
  • [4] Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
    Chen, Shawn C.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (04) : 856 - 861
  • [5] Does Trainee Participation During Colonoscopy Affect Adenoma Detection Rates?
    Eckardt, Alexander J.
    Swales, Colin
    Bhattacharya, Kanishka
    Wassef, Wahid Y.
    Leung, Katherine
    Levey, John M.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (07) : 1337 - 1344
  • [6] Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: An introduction
    Faigel, DO
    Pike, IM
    Baron, TH
    Chak, A
    Cohen, J
    Deal, SE
    Hoffman, B
    Jacobson, BC
    Mergener, K
    Petersen, BT
    Petrini, JL
    Rex, DK
    Safdi, MA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (04) : 866 - 872
  • [7] Colonoscopy and Diminutive Polyps: Hot or Cold Biopsy or Snare? Do I Send to Pathology?
    Hewett, David G.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (02) : 102 - 105
  • [8] The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy: Results of a decision analysis
    Hur, Chin
    Chung, Daniel C.
    Schoen, Robert E.
    Gazelle, G. Scott
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (02) : 237 - 244
  • [9] Jemal A, 2009, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V59, P225, DOI [10.3322/caac.20006, 10.3322/caac.21387]
  • [10] Colorectal polyps and their relationship to cancer
    Kim, EC
    Lance, P
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 26 (01) : 1 - &