Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research

被引:136
作者
Kerr, Cicely [1 ]
Nixon, Annabel [1 ]
Wild, Diane [1 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford OX2 0JJ, England
关键词
guidelines; methods; patient-reported outcomes; qualitative research; quality of life; saturation; TASK-FORCE; CONTENT VALIDITY; PRO MEASURES;
D O I
10.1586/ERP.10.30
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) field, strict regulatory requirements must be met for qualitative research that contributes to labeling claims for medicinal products. These requirements not only emphasize the importance of reaching saturation but also of providing documentary evidence that saturation has been reached. This paper reviews qualitative literature for useful definitions of the concept and for practical approaches for assessing saturation. The paper considers approaches in light of the rigorous regulatory requirements for PRO research that are used to support labeling claims for medicinal products and the wider requirements for flexibility and creativity in qualitative research in general. This assessment is facilitated by the use of examples from our past qualitative PRO studies. Based on conclusions from this assessment, we offer preliminary recommendations for future qualitative PRO studies for assessing and documenting saturation.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 281
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] The Internet as a source of data to support the development of a quality-of-life measure for eating disorders
    Adair, CE
    Marcoux, G
    Williams, A
    Reimer, M
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (04) : 538 - 546
  • [2] [Anonymous], QUAL DAT AN SOFTW VE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, QUALITATIVE PSYCHOL
  • [4] Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note
    Bowen, Glenn A.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (01) : 137 - 152
  • [5] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • [6] Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience
    Brod, Meryl
    Tesler, Laura E.
    Christensen, Torsten L.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (09) : 1263 - 1278
  • [7] The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval
    Burke, L. B.
    Kennedy, D. L.
    Miskala, P. H.
    Papadopoulos, E. J.
    Trentacosti, A. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (02) : 281 - 283
  • [8] Caellii K., 2003, International journal of Qualitative Methods, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1177/160940690300200201, 10.1177/160940690300200201]
  • [9] Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Coons, Stephen Joel
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Lundy, J. Jason
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Lenderking, William R.
    Cella, David
    Basch, Ethan
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) : 419 - 429
  • [10] Fallowfield L., 1990, QUALITY LIFE MISSING