Currents in STSE Education: Mapping a Complex Field, 40 Years On

被引:122
作者
Pedretti, Erminia [1 ]
Nazir, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, OISE, Dept Curriculum Teaching & Learning, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6, Canada
关键词
SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; TEACHER-EDUCATION; DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS; SCHOOL; ARGUMENTATION; CLASSROOM; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1002/sce.20435
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
It has been 40 years since science, technology, society, and environment (STSE) education first appeared in science education research and practice. Although supported among many educators worldwide, there is much confusion surrounding the STSE slogan. Widely differing discourses on STSE education and diverse ways of practicing, have led to an array of distinct pedagogical approaches, programs, and methods. We are left wondering how we might orient ourselves amid such a diversity of propositions. What does STSE look like in practice? What ideological orientations underpin its practice? In this paper, we review the research literature and educational practices in STSE education to (1) map out a typology of STSE education in the form of currents and (2) provide a heuristic that educators can use for critical analysis of discourses and practices in the field. We identify, explore, and critique six currents in STSE education: application/design, historical, logical reasoning, value-centered, sociocultural, and socio-ecojustice currents. We suggest that these currents may serve as a didactic tool for others, a framework that will assist educators in informing their own theoretical understandings, choices, and practices in the context of STSE education. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 95: 601-626, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 626
页数:26
相关论文
共 207 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Khalick F, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P1057, DOI 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-C
[3]  
Aikenhead G., 2000, Rekindling traditions: Cross-cultural science technology units
[4]  
Aikenhead G., 2003, A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham, P59
[5]  
Aikenhead G., 2001, RES SCI EDUC, V31, P337, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1013151709605
[6]  
Aikenhead G., 1991, Logical reasoning in science and technology
[7]  
Aikenhead G., 1994, STS education: International perspectives on reform, P47
[8]  
Aikenhead G.S., 2006, SCI ED EVERYDAY LIFE
[9]  
Aikenhead GS, 1997, SCI EDUC, V81, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199704)81:2<217::AID-SCE6>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-3