Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis

被引:11
|
作者
Sandell, Eva [1 ]
Berg, Maria [3 ]
Sandblom, Gabriel [2 ,4 ]
Sundman, Joar [5 ]
Franneby, Ulf [2 ]
Bostrom, Lennart [6 ]
Andren-Sandberg, Ake [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Varby Gen Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMC SURGERY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Signs and symptoms; Decision-making; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; PATIENT; MANAGEMENT; THINK; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient's own wishes, the surgeon's core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than "soft" clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. Methods: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three-month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Sodersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. Results: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. Conclusion: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for Discretion
    Hoybye-Mortensen, Matilde
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 45 (02) : 600 - 615
  • [42] Maximization delays decision-making in acute care nursing
    Ricardo Tejeiro
    Antonio Romero-Moreno
    Alberto Paramio
    Serafín Cruces-Montes
    María Concepción Galán-Artímez
    Judit Santos-Marroquín
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [43] Ultrasonography aids decision-making in children with abdominal pain
    Scammell, S.
    Lansdale, N.
    Sprigg, A.
    Campbell, D.
    Marven, S.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (05) : 405 - 409
  • [44] Maximization delays decision-making in acute care nursing
    Tejeiro, Ricardo
    Romero-Moreno, Antonio
    Paramio, Alberto
    Cruces-Montes, Serafin
    Galan-Artimez, Maria Concepcion
    Santos-Marroquin, Judit
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [45] The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics
    Charani, E.
    Ahmad, R.
    Rawson, T. M.
    Castro-Sanchez, E.
    Tarrant, C.
    Holmes, A. H.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 69 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [46] Decision-Making and the Applying of Decision-Making Techniques in SMEs in Kosovo
    Tahiri, Alberta
    Kovaci, Idriz
    Bushi, Fari
    Meha, Arbresha
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2021, 22 (180): : 64 - 67
  • [47] The decision-making for surgical therapy in acquired valvular heart disease
    Kress, P
    HERZ KREISLAUF, 1997, 29 (05): : 151 - 156
  • [48] The decision-making for surgical therapy in acquired valvular heart disease
    Kress, P
    HERZ KREISLAUF, 1997, 29 (06): : 185 - 191
  • [49] The Spastic Upper Extremity in Children: Multilevel Surgical Decision-making
    Chaudhry, Sonia
    Bhardwaj, Praveen
    Venkatramani, Hari
    Sabapathy, S. Raja
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (09) : E416 - E426
  • [50] REFERRAL OF SURGICAL PATIENTS TO AN ANESTHETIC CLINIC - A DECISION-MAKING ANALYSIS
    LEE, A
    LUM, ME
    HILLMAN, KM
    BAUMAN, A
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1994, 22 (05) : 562 - 567