Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis

被引:11
|
作者
Sandell, Eva [1 ]
Berg, Maria [3 ]
Sandblom, Gabriel [2 ,4 ]
Sundman, Joar [5 ]
Franneby, Ulf [2 ]
Bostrom, Lennart [6 ]
Andren-Sandberg, Ake [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Varby Gen Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMC SURGERY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Signs and symptoms; Decision-making; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; PATIENT; MANAGEMENT; THINK; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient's own wishes, the surgeon's core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than "soft" clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. Methods: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three-month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Sodersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. Results: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. Conclusion: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effect of Unenhanced MRI on the Surgeons’ Decision-Making Process in Females with Suspected Appendicitis
    C. M. P. Ziedses des Plantes
    M. J. F. van Veen
    J. van der Palen
    J. M. Klaase
    H. A. J. Gielkens
    R. H. Geelkerken
    World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 2881 - 2887
  • [32] Clinical decision support for therapeutic decision-making in cancer: A systematic review
    Beauchemin, Melissa
    Murray, Meghan T.
    Sung, Lillian
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Weng, Chunhua
    Schnall, Rebecca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 130
  • [33] Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: A prospective study
    Zielke, A
    Hasse, C
    Sitter, H
    Rothmund, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 164 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [34] THE VALUE OF HISTORY AND CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN CHILDHOOD, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO COMPUTER-BASED DECISION-MAKING
    ESKELINEN, M
    IKONEN, J
    LIPPONEN, P
    THEORETICAL SURGERY, 1993, 8 (04): : 203 - 209
  • [35] Environmental monitoring and decision-making
    Jacobs, T
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 37 (04): : 759 - 764
  • [36] Decision-Making Styles and Stress
    Allwood, Carl Martin
    Salo, Ilkka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (01) : 34 - 47
  • [37] Antibiotic Decision-Making in the ICU
    Parra-Rodriguez, Luis
    Guillamet, M. Cristina Vazquez
    SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 43 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [38] Delay in Decision-Making Affecting Construction Projects: A Sustainable Decision-Making Model for Mega Projects
    Khahro, Shabir Hussain
    Shaikh, Haseeb Haleem
    Zainun, Noor Yasmin
    Sultan, Basel
    Khahro, Qasim Hussain
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [39] MODERN AIDS TO CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN THE ACUTE ABDOMEN
    PATERSONBROWN, S
    VIPOND, MN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [40] Decision-making process in long term acute cholecystitis
    de Laspra, ECD
    Alonso, CC
    Martín, JMA
    Cortés, AA
    Marco, FJD
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2001, 93 (01) : 25 - 28