Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis

被引:11
|
作者
Sandell, Eva [1 ]
Berg, Maria [3 ]
Sandblom, Gabriel [2 ,4 ]
Sundman, Joar [5 ]
Franneby, Ulf [2 ]
Bostrom, Lennart [6 ]
Andren-Sandberg, Ake [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Varby Gen Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMC SURGERY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Acute appendicitis; Signs and symptoms; Decision-making; ACUTE ABDOMINAL-PAIN; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; PATIENT; MANAGEMENT; THINK; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient's own wishes, the surgeon's core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than "soft" clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings. The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery. Methods: All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three-month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Sodersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy. Results: In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact. Conclusion: Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-operative treatment of appendicitis: public perception and decision-making
    Emer P. O’Connell
    Annmarie White
    Paul Cromwell
    Emma Carroll
    Waqar Khan
    Ronan Waldron
    Iqbal Z. Khan
    Kevin Barry
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2018, 187 : 1029 - 1038
  • [22] Surgical decision-making in the digital age: the role of telemedicine - a narrative review
    Parveen, Shehla
    Amjad, Maryam
    Rauf, Sameer Abdul
    Arbab, Shahdil
    Jamalvi, Syed Abdan
    Saleem, Shah Emaad-Ur-Rehman
    Ali, Syed Khizar
    Bai, Jaiwanti
    Mustansir, Maria
    Danish, Fnu
    Khalil, Muhammad Asif
    Haque, Md Ariful
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 87 (01): : 242 - 249
  • [23] ACUTE STRESS AND DECISION-MAKING: AN FRN STUDY
    Naumann, Peter
    Huetcher, Sophie
    Sistemich, Viola
    Hertel, Elizabeth
    Hecht, Holger
    Naumann, Ewald
    Miltner, Wolfgang H. R.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 54 : S115 - S115
  • [24] Ethical evaluation in acute stroke decision-making
    Shamy, Michel
    Dewar, Brian
    Fedyk, Mark
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (05) : 749 - 755
  • [25] Geriatric assessment and treatment decision-making in surgical oncology
    Chesney, Tyler R.
    Daza, Julian F.
    Wong, Camilla L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 17 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [26] Judgement: clinical decision-making as a core surgical competency
    Crebbin, Wendy
    Beasley, Spencer
    Tobin, Stephen
    Guest, Glenn
    Duvivier, Robbert
    Watters, David
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (06) : 760 - 763
  • [27] Surgical Decision-Making and the Influence of Biologic Markers: Reply
    Swati Kulkarni
    David Hicks
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 3616 - 3616
  • [28] Decision-Making in Healthcare. A Bibliometric Exploration
    Olariu, Ana Alexandra
    Breazu, Andreea
    Popa, Stefan Catalin
    Popa, Catalina Florentina
    Caruceru, Nicoleta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2024, 18 (01): : 3242 - 3254
  • [29] Surgical Decision-Making and the Influence of Biologic Markers: Reply
    Kulkarni, Swati
    Hicks, David
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (12) : 3616 - 3616
  • [30] DECISION-MAKING AUTOMATION FUZZY DECISION-MAKING IN INDUSTRY
    Soulhi, Aziz
    Guedira, Said
    El Alami, Nour-eddine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DATA BASES, 2009, : 181 - +