The Geometry of Spatial Analyses: Implications for Conservation Biologists

被引:22
|
作者
Landeiro, Victor Lemes [1 ]
Magnusson, William Ernest [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Amazonia INPA, Programa Posgrad Ecol, BR-69011970 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
来源
NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO | 2011年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Conservation Biology; Autocorrelation; Space; Variance Partitioning; SAR; Spatial Filters; EXPLAINING BETA DIVERSITY; RED HERRINGS; GEOGRAPHICAL ECOLOGY; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; AUTOCORRELATION; POPULATION; MATRICES; DESIGN; MODELS; FOREST;
D O I
10.4322/natcon.2011.002
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Most conservation biology is about the management of space and therefore requires spatial analyses. However, recent debates in the literature have focused on a limited range of issues related to spatial analyses that are not always of primary interest to conservation biologists, especially autocorrelation and spatial confounding. Explanations of how these analyses work, and what they do, are permeated with mathematical formulas and statistical concepts that are outside the experience of most working conservationists. Here, we describe the concepts behind these analyses using simple simulations to exemplify their main goals, functions and assumptions, and graphically illustrate how processes combine to generate common spatial patterns. Understanding these concepts will allow conservation biologists to make better decisions about the analyses most appropriate for their problems.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 19
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHY PALEOBIOLOGICAL INSIGHTS MATTER FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGISTS
    Liow, Lee Hsiang
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY, 2012, : 25 - 28
  • [2] An epigenetic toolbox for conservation biologists
    Balard, Alice
    Baltazar-Soares, Miguel
    Eizaguirre, Christophe
    Heckwolf, Melanie J.
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (06):
  • [3] What do conservation biologists publish?
    Fazey, I
    Fischer, J
    Lindenmayer, DB
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 124 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [4] Spatial and taxonomic biases in bat records: Drivers and conservation implications in a megadiverse country
    Zamora-Gutierrez, Veronica
    Amano, Tatsuya
    Jones, Kate E.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (24): : 14130 - 14141
  • [5] The Culture of Conservation Biologists: Show Me the Hope!
    Swaisgood, Ronald R.
    Sheppard, James K.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 60 (08) : 626 - 630
  • [6] Spatial distribution and breeding performance of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Sicily: implications for conservation
    Di Vittori, Massimiliano
    Lopez-Lopez, Pascual
    ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2014, 49 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [7] The impact of spatial aggregation on urban development analyses
    Jacobs-Crisioni, Chris
    Rietveld, Piet
    Koomen, Eric
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 47 : 46 - 56
  • [8] Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different results?
    Landeiro, Victor L.
    Magnusson, William E.
    Melo, Adriano S.
    Espirito-Santo, Helder M. V.
    Bini, Luis M.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (06) : 1184 - 1192
  • [9] Bridging the Gap: How Can Information Access and Exchange Between Conservation Biologists and Field Practitioners be Improved for Better Conservation Outcomes?
    Sunderland, Terry
    Sunderland-Groves, Jacqueline
    Shanley, Patricia
    Campbell, Bruce
    BIOTROPICA, 2009, 41 (05) : 549 - 554
  • [10] A review of techniques for spatial modeling in geographical, conservation and landscape genetics
    Felizola Diniz-Filho, Jose Alexandre
    Nabout, Joao Carlos
    de Campos Telles, Mariana Pires
    Soares, Thannya Nascimento
    Rangel, Thiago Fernando L. V. B.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (02) : 203 - 211