How CO2-to-Diesel Technology Could Help Reach Net-Zero Emissions Targets: A Canadian Case Study

被引:9
作者
Ruttinger, Andrew William [1 ,2 ]
Kannangara, Miyuru [1 ]
Shadbahr, Jalil [1 ]
De Luna, Phil [1 ]
Bensebaa, Farid [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[2] Cornell Univ, Robert F Smith Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
carbon capture; utilization and storage; technology learning curves; levelized cost of carbon abatement; CO2-to-diesel; emissions mitigation; CO2; UTILIZATION; BIODIESEL; ECONOMICS; CAPTURE; CURVES; COST;
D O I
10.3390/en14216957
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an attractive technology for the decarbonization of global energy systems. However, its early development stage makes impact assessment difficult. Moreover, rising popularity in carbon pricing necessitates the development of a methodology for deriving carbon abatement costs that are harmonized with the price of carbon. We develop, using a combined bottom-up analysis and top-down learning curve approach, a levelized cost of carbon abatement (LCCA) model for assessing the true cost of emissions mitigation in CCUS technology under carbon pricing mechanisms. We demonstrate our methodology by adapting three policy scenarios in Canada to explore how the implementation of CO2-to-diesel technologies could economically decarbonize Canada's transportation sector. With continued policy development, Canada can avoid 932 MtCO(2)eq by 2075 at an LCCA of CA$209/tCO(2)eq. Technological learning, low emission hydroelectricity generation, and cost-effective electricity prices make Quebec and Manitoba uniquely positioned to support CO2-to-diesel technology. The additional policy supports beyond 2030, including an escalating carbon price, CO2-derived fuel blending requirements, or investment in low-cost renewable electricity, which can accelerate market diffusion of CO2-to-diesel technology in Canada. This methodology is applicable to different jurisdictions and disruptive technologies, providing ample foci for future work to leverage this combined technology learning + LCCA approach.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs [J].
Brynolf, Selma ;
Taljegard, Maria ;
Grahn, Maria ;
Hansson, Julia .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :1887-1905
[12]  
Canada Energy Regulator, 2020, CAN EN FUT 2020 EN S
[13]  
Canada Energy Regulator, CAN REN POW LANDSC 2
[14]  
Competition Bureau Canada, GUID RET GAS PRIC CA
[15]   Assessment of renewable energy transition pathways for a fossil fuel-dependent electricity-producing jurisdiction [J].
Davis, Matthew ;
Moronkeji, Adeoye ;
Ahiduzzaman, Md ;
Kumar, Amit .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 59 :243-261
[16]   The limits of transport decarbonization under the current growth paradigm [J].
de Blas, Ignacio ;
Mediavilla, Margarita ;
Capellan-Perez, Inigo ;
Duce, Carmen .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 32
[17]   What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? [J].
De Luna, Phil ;
Hahn, Christopher ;
Higgins, Drew ;
Jaffer, Shaffiq A. ;
Jaramillo, Thomas F. ;
Sargent, Edward H. .
SCIENCE, 2019, 364 (6438) :350-+
[18]  
Department of the Environment, 2020, Canada Gazette, V154, P3761
[19]   Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis [J].
Dimitriou, Ioanna ;
Garcia-Gutierrez, Pelayo ;
Elder, Rachael H. ;
Cuellar-Franca, Rosa M. ;
Azapagic, Adisa ;
Allen, Ray W. K. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (06) :1775-1789
[20]  
Environment and Climate Change Canada, WHAT IS CLEAN FUEL S