Initiation of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Dramatically Reduces Systemic Opioid Use in Patients With Advanced Cancer

被引:21
作者
Sindt, Jill E. [1 ]
Odell, Daniel W. [1 ]
Dalley, Andrew P. [1 ]
Brogan, Shane E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2020年 / 23卷 / 07期
关键词
Cancer pain; intrathecal drug delivery; intrathecal drug delivery system; intrathecal therapy; targeted drug delivery; CONFERENCE PACC RECOMMENDATIONS; COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT; PAIN-CONTROL; THERAPY; ZICONOTIDE; DIVERSION; ANALGESIA; TOXICITY; EFFICACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/ner.13175
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives Pain is common in cancer, affecting more than 70% of patients with advanced disease. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are a well-established treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain, improving pain control and reducing associated side effects. To date, details of systemic opioid use before and after IDDS implant have not been reported. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients at Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah treated with IDDS for cancer pain from May 2014 to May 2018. Oral, transdermal, and parenteral opioid use before IDDS implant was compared to use 30 days postoperatively. Results A total of 173 patients were included, 93% with stage IV disease. The pre-implant median daily oral morphine equivalent (OME) was 240 mg (interquartile range 130-390, range 0-2616 mg). OME doses >200 mg/day were required by 57% of patients, and >500 mg OME by 19% of patients. The post-implant median OME was 0 mg (interquartile range 0-0, range 0-480 mg) and 82.6% of patients discontinued systemic opioids completely. 11.0% of patients used <100 mg OME, and only 1.7% of patients used >200 mg OME. Mean OME decreased by 94% following IDDS implant (p < 0.0001) and all patients who continued to use systemic opioids required a lower OME compared to pre-implant. Conclusions In the largest cohort of patients with advanced cancer and refractory pain treated with IDDS, implantation was associated with a dramatic reduction in systemic opioid use 30 days postoperatively, with a large majority of patients discontinuing systemic opioids. Those patients that continued systemic opioids utilized significantly lower doses as compared to their pre-implant dose.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 983
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain
    Xing, Fangfang
    Yong, R. Jason
    Kaye, Alan David
    Urman, Richard D.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2018, 22 (02)
  • [2] Managing Intrathecal Drug Delivery (ITDD) in Cancer Patients
    Shah, Rajiv
    Baqai-Stern, Aisha
    Gulati, Amitabh
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2015, 19 (06)
  • [3] Attitudes of Hospice Providers Regarding Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Patients With Cancer
    Warner, Lindsay L.
    Moeschler, Susan S.
    Pittelkow, Thomas P.
    Strand, Jacob J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 36 (11) : 955 - 958
  • [4] Cancer patients quality of life after intrathecal drug delivery for advanced pain management: a patient-reported outcome analysis
    Goel, Vasudha
    Kaizer, Alexander
    Darrow, David
    Rosielle, Drew
    Owens, Benjamin
    Blaes, Anne
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2025, 26 (05) : 261 - 268
  • [5] Perioperative Opioid Consumption and Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Patients With a Pre-existing Opioid-Based Intrathecal Drug Delivery System
    D'Souza, Ryan S.
    Warner, Matthew A.
    Olatoye, Oludare O.
    Langford, Brendan J.
    Bruns, Danette L.
    Schroeder, Darrell R.
    Mauck, William D.
    Schaefer, Kalli K.
    Warner, Nafisseh S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [6] Considerations for Evaluating the Use of Intrathecal Drug Delivery in the Oncologic Patient
    Gulati, Amitabh
    Puttanniah, Vinay
    Hung, Joseph
    Malhotra, Vivek
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2014, 18 (02)
  • [7] Implanted intrathecal drug delivery systems may be associated with improved survival in patients with cancer
    Mitchell, Alison
    Somerville, Lesley
    Williams, Nicola
    Mcghie, Jonathan
    Mcconnachie, Alex
    Mcginn, Gordon
    Lee, Jiyoung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 18 (02) : 110 - 119
  • [8] Effects of an Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Connected to a Subcutaneous Port on Pain, Mood and Quality of Life in End Stage Cancer Patients: An Observational Study
    Giglio, Mariateresa
    Preziosa, Angela
    Mele, Roberta
    Brienza, Nicola
    Grasso, Salvatore
    Puntillo, Filomena
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [9] Surgical Site Infections in Cancer Patients with Intrathecal Drug Delivery Devices
    Scanlon, Maura M.
    Gazelka, Halena M.
    Moeschler, Susan M.
    Hoelzer, Bryan C.
    Hooten, W. Michael
    Bendel, Markus A.
    Lamer, Tim J.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (03) : 520 - 525
  • [10] Dorsal Versus Ventral Intrathecal Catheter Tip Location and Effect on Dose Escalation and Opioid Use in Patients With Cancer Pain
    Brogan, Shane E.
    Odell, Daniel W.
    Sindt, Jill E.
    Yi, Iasson
    Chrisman, Olga M.
    Zhang, Chong
    Presson, Angela P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (06): : 1233 - 1239