Biogas production within the bioethanol production chain: Use of co-substrates for anaerobic digestion of sugar beet vinasse

被引:55
作者
Moraes, B. S. [1 ]
Triolo, J. M. [2 ]
Lecona, V. P. [2 ]
Zaiat, M. [3 ]
Sommer, S. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Ctr Res Energy & Mat CNPEM, Brazilian Bioethanol Sci & Technol Lab CTBE, BR-13083970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Engn, Dept Chem Engn Biotechnol & Environm Technol, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Engn Sch EESC, Ctr Res Dev & Innovat Environm Engn CPDI EA, Biol Proc Lab LPB, BR-13563120 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Co-digestion; Sugar beet vinasse; Cow manure; C/N ratio; Continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR); FOOD WASTE; MANURE; BIODEGRADABILITY; FERMENTATION; PERSPECTIVES; REACTOR; FUTURE; ENERGY; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.089
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Bioethanol production generates large amounts of vinasse, which is suitable for biogas production. In this study, the anaerobic digestion of sugar beet vinasse was optimised using continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTR) supplemented either with lime fertiliser or with 3% cow manure. In both reactors, the C/N ratio was adjusted by adding straw. The biochemical methane potential (BMP) of vinasse was 267.4 +/- 4.5 L CH4 kg VS-1. Due to the low content of macro-and micronutrients and low C/N ratio of vinasse, biogas production failed when vinasse alone was fed to the reactor. When co-substrate was added, biogas production achieved very close to the BMP of vinasse, being 235.7 +/- 32.2 L CH4 kg VS-1 from the fertiliser supplied reactor and 265.2 +/- 26.8 L CH4 kg VS-1 in manure supplied reactor at steady state. Anaerobic digestion was the most stable when cow manure was supplied to digestion of vinasse. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 234
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
AHRING BK, 1995, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V43, P559, DOI 10.1007/BF00218466
[2]   Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants - Status and future trends [J].
Angelidaki, I ;
Ellegaard, L .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2003, 109 (1-3) :95-105
[3]   Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure [J].
Angelidaki, I ;
Ahring, BK .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (03) :189-194
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Fermentation of organic materials. Characterization of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[6]  
Belhadj S., 2013, IOSR JESTFT, V5, P72
[7]   Biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and cheese whey [J].
Comino, Elena ;
Riggio, Vincenzo A. ;
Rosso, Maurizio .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 114 :46-53
[8]   UTILIZATION OF VINASSE EFFLUENTS FROM AN ANAEROBIC REACTOR [J].
COSTA, FJCB ;
ROCHA, BBM ;
VIANA, CE ;
TOLEDO, AC .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 18 (12) :135-141
[9]   Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane [J].
Demirel, B. ;
Scherer, P. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (03) :992-998
[10]  
Deublein D., 2011, Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: An Introduction