SMEs and barriers to Eco-innovation in the EU: exploring different firm profiles

被引:100
作者
Marin, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Marzucchi, Alberto [3 ]
Zoboli, Roberto [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, IRCrES CNR Res Inst Sustainable Econ Growth, Milan, Italy
[2] OFCE SciencesPo, Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] Catholic Univ Milan, Dept Int Econ Inst & Dev, Milan, Italy
关键词
Eco-innovation; Barriers to innovation; SMEs; Green strategy; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY PUSH; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT; GREEN; DEMAND; COMPLEMENTARITIES; CONSTRAINTS; STRATEGIES; OBSTACLES;
D O I
10.1007/s00191-015-0407-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Eco-innovation is an explicit aim of major EU policy strategies. Many environmental policies de facto require firms to eco-innovate to comply with policy requirements, while the overlap between policy-driven and market-driven eco-innovation strategies is increasingly important for many firms. Barriers to eco-innovation can then emerge as a critical factor in either preventing or stimulating EU strategies, policy implementation, and the green strategies of firms. In this paper we focus on EU-27 SMEs. We single out and explore different firm profiles, considering eco-innovation barriers and engagement. Our analysis is based on a particularly suitable dataset: the Eurobarometer survey on "Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation". We identify six clusters of SMEs. These clusters include firms facing either 'Revealed barriers' or 'Deterring barriers', 'Cost deterred' firms, 'Market deterred' firms, 'Non eco-innovators', and 'Green champions'. The clusters display substantial differences in terms of eco-innovation adoption. We show that our taxonomy has little overlap with sector classifications. This diversity should be taken into account for successful environmental and innovation policies.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 705
页数:35
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[2]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[3]   Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation [J].
Antonietti, Roberto ;
Marzucchi, Alberto .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 :150-161
[4]   Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers [J].
Baldwin, J ;
Lin, ZX .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (01) :1-18
[5]  
Baumol W. J., 1988, THEORY ENV POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513
[6]   Where there is a will, there is a way? Assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Huiban, Jean-Pierre ;
Musolesi, Antonio ;
Sevestre, Patrick .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2013, 22 (03) :679-710
[7]   Environmental innovation and socio-economic dynamics in institutional and policy contexts [J].
Borghesi, Simone ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Crespi, Francesco ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2013, 23 (02) :241-245
[8]  
Breschi S., 1997, Systems of Innovation. Technologies, P130, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203357620
[9]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[10]  
Cainelli Giulio, 2011, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, V11, P328, DOI 10.1504/IJTPM.2011.042090