Repeatability of diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate using whole lesion ADC values, skew and histogram analysis

被引:38
作者
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lawrence, Edward M. [1 ,5 ]
Priest, Andrew N. [2 ]
Warren, Anne Y. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Gallagher, Ferdia A. [1 ,2 ]
Sala, Evis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge, England
[7] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Prostate cancer diffusion; Magnetic resonance imaging; Reproducibility of results; RADS VERSION 2; AGGRESSIVENESS ASSESSMENT; CANCER; COEFFICIENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; TUMOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the repeatability of diffusion-weighted imaging parameter including ADC-derived histogram values in prostate cancer. Methods: 10 patients with prostate cancer were prospectively recruited to a retest cohort. 3 T diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate was acquired consecutively with patient getting off the scanner between studies. Prostatectomy-histopathology defined tumour regions-of-interest were outlined on ADC maps and diffusion-weighted metrics including histograms were calculated. The coefficient of reproducibility (CoR) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess repeatability. Results: 10th centile, 90th centile, and median ADC showed good repeatability with mean difference ranging from -0.005 to -0.025 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1), and CoR ranging from 0.271-0.294 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1) of scan 1 mean). Two measures of heterogeneity and simplified texture, IQR and mean local range, had only moderate repeatability. IQR had a mean difference of -0.032 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1) between scans with CoR 0.181 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1) (56% of scan 1 mean). Mean local range had a mean difference -0.008 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1) between scans (37% of scan 1 mean). Bland-Altman plots showed good repeatability for test and re-test analysis for median, percentile and mean range values. All ADC values had good reliability regardless of whether the tumour border was included in quantitative analysis. ADC histogram skew had poor repeatability, CoR 0.78 x 10(3) mm(2)s(-1) (373% of scan 1 mean). Conclusion: 10th and 90th centile ADC demonstrated sufficient repeatability for clinical use. However, more advanced measures of heterogeneity such as histogram skew, IQR, or mean local range may be limited by their repeatability.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [3] [Anonymous], PROST CANC DIAGN TRE
  • [4] National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting
    Appayya, Mrishta Brizmohun
    Adshead, Jim
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Allen, Clare
    Bainbridge, Alan
    Barrett, Tristan
    Giganti, Francesco
    Graham, John
    Haslam, Phil
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Kastner, Christof
    Kirkham, Alexander P. S.
    Lipton, Alexandra
    McNeill, Alan
    Moniz, Larissa
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Nabi, Ghulam
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Parker, Chris
    Patel, Amit
    Pursey, Jacqueline
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Staffurth, John
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Walls, Darren
    Punwani, Shonit
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [5] PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know
    Barrett, T.
    Turkbey, B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1165 - 1176
  • [6] Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population
    Barrett, Tristan
    McLean, Mary
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Lawrence, Edward M.
    Patterson, Andrew J.
    Koo, Brendan C.
    Patterson, Ilse
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Doble, Andrew
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Kastner, Christof
    Gallagher, Ferdia A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (08) : 3141 - 3150
  • [7] The Emerging Role of MRI in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance and Ongoing Challenges
    Barrett, Tristan
    Haider, Masoom A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [8] Ratio of Tumor to Normal Prostate Tissue Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Method for Quantifying DWI of the Prostate
    Barrett, Tristan
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Lawrence, Edward M.
    Goldman, Debra A.
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Sala, Evis
    Gallagher, Ferdia A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (06) : W585 - W593
  • [9] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [10] Short- and Midterm Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements at 3.0-T Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Abdomen
    Braithwaite, Adam C.
    Dale, Brian M.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) : 459 - 465