Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, Juan [1 ,4 ]
Bardawil, Elise [1 ]
Zurawin, Robert K. [3 ]
Wu, Junwei [4 ]
Fu, Huaying [4 ]
Orejuela, Francisco [2 ]
Guan, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Sect Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Div Urogynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 6651 Main St,10th Floor, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Shi, Peoples R China
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Retroperitoneal tunneling technique; Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS); Sacrocolpopexy; V-Loc suture; ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; LEARNING-CURVE; STANDARDIZATION; FEASIBILITY; CANCER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. Case Presentation: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. Management and Outcome: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was -5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50-99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 +/- 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 +/- 3.02 and 5.80 +/- 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. Discussion: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does single-site robotic surgery makes sense for gallbladder surgery?
    Bosi, Henrique Rasia
    Rombaldi, Marcelo Costamilan
    Zaniratti, Thamyres
    Castilhos, Fernanda Oliveira
    Sbaraini, Mariana
    Grossi, Joao Vicente
    Pretto, Guilherme Goncalves
    Cavazzola, Leandro Totti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2022, 18 (03):
  • [32] Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology
    El Hachem, Lena
    Momeni, Mazdak
    Friedman, Kathryn
    Moshier, Erin L.
    Chuang, Linus T.
    Gretz, Herbert F., III
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (03): : 509 - 516
  • [33] Robotic single-site myomectomy: A single-center experience of 101 consecutive cases
    Kim, Miseon
    Kim, Mi Kyoung
    Kim, Mi-La
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Yun, Bo Seong
    Seong, Seok Ju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [34] A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications: a case series
    Goodwin, Alexandra, I
    Torres, Jose
    O'Shaughnessy, Danielle L.
    Finamore, Peter S.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (11) : 3231 - 3236
  • [35] Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysteropexy
    Michael S. Ingber
    Marc D. Colton
    Gregg E. Zimmerman
    Updates in Surgery, 2012, 64 (1) : 53 - 57
  • [36] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology
    Sobolewski, Craig
    Yeung, Patrick P., Jr.
    Hart, Stuart
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 38 (04) : 741 - +
  • [37] Comparative analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A propensity score matching study
    Chen, Yan
    Zhou, Youjun
    Tan, Liping
    Chen, Shihui
    Wu, Chunhua
    Liang, Yanling
    Sun, Nannan
    Liu, Juan
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
  • [38] Adoption of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy at an Academic Institution
    Bradley, Megan S.
    Kantartzis, Kelly L.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Winger, Dan
    Wang, Li
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [39] A comparison of surgical outcomes between single-site robotic, multiport robotic and conventional laparoscopic techniques in performing hysterectomy for Benign indications
    Gupta, Natasha
    Miranda Blevins, D.
    Holcombe, Jenny
    Furr, Robert
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2020, 9 (02): : 59 - 63
  • [40] Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysteropexy
    Ingber, Michael S.
    Colton, Marc D.
    Zimmerman, Gregg E.
    UPDATES IN SURGERY-ITALY, 2012, 64 (01): : 53 - 57